Ex. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update)
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: Ex. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update)
Ex. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update)
Organic Waste Processing Capacity StudyFor theSan Francisco Bay Area RegionPrepared forRecologyWASTE ZEROPrepared by:Tint Compliance MtfWCMfNISacramen Ex. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update)nto, California42705Table of ContentsBackground.............................................................................2AB 1826..............................................................................2SB 1383..............................................................................3AB Ex. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update)1594..............................................................................4AB 876.............................................................Ex. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update)
..................5Organic Waste Diversion Timeline.......................................................5Summary of San Francisco's Food Waste CapacOrganic Waste Processing Capacity StudyFor theSan Francisco Bay Area RegionPrepared forRecologyWASTE ZEROPrepared by:Tint Compliance MtfWCMfNISacramen Ex. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update)nics Capacity.........................................................13Regulatory Constraints and Cost Impacts................................................14Total Costs of Developing New Capacity.................................................16Summary........................................... Ex. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update).....................................191BackgroundThe purpose of this report is to quantify the amount of organic waste that San Francisco will need tEx. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update)
o divert from landfills to comply with California's newest statewide mandates, and identify the amount of additional organic waste processing needed cOrganic Waste Processing Capacity StudyFor theSan Francisco Bay Area RegionPrepared forRecologyWASTE ZEROPrepared by:Tint Compliance MtfWCMfNISacramen Ex. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update)cover than yard waste or other organics. Food waste requires a special type of facility in order to be composted, and is subject to a greater regulatory burden than yard waste only composting facilities. This report will then estimate the new composting infrastructure requirements and costs based on Ex. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update) projected food waste diversion goals.The mandates driving the organic waste diversion goals, described below, each have an organic waste diversion taEx. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update)
rget and a time frame. These tonnage targets are described in the following section and arc based on the best publically available data.AB 1826In OctoOrganic Waste Processing Capacity StudyFor theSan Francisco Bay Area RegionPrepared forRecologyWASTE ZEROPrepared by:Tint Compliance MtfWCMfNISacramen Ex. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update)ount of waste they generate per week. This law also requires that on and after January 1, 2016, local jurisdictions across the state implement a commercial Organic Waste Recycling Program to divert organic waste generated by businesses. Jurisdictions must conduct outreach, education, and monitoring Ex. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update)to ensure qualified business participate and comply with the law. The ultimate goal of the bill is to divert 50% of organics disposal from commercialEx. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update)
businesses by 2020 as compared to 2014, estimated at 8.1 million new statewide tons of organics by 2020.Specific requirements for the Organic Waste ReOrganic Waste Processing Capacity StudyFor theSan Francisco Bay Area RegionPrepared forRecologyWASTE ZEROPrepared by:Tint Compliance MtfWCMfNISacramen Ex. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update)wing the AB 341 (Mandatory Commercial Recycling) regulations.J Existing organic waste recycling facilities within a reasonable vicinity and the capacities available for materials to be accepted at each facility.J Existing solid waste and organic waste recycling facilities within the jurisdiction tha Ex. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update)t may be suitable for potential expansion or colocation of organic waste processing or recycling facilities.J Efforts of which the jurisdiction is awaEx. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update)
re that arc underway to develop new private or public regional organic waste recycling facilities that may serve some or all of the organic waste recyOrganic Waste Processing Capacity StudyFor theSan Francisco Bay Area RegionPrepared forRecologyWASTE ZEROPrepared by:Tint Compliance MtfWCMfNISacramen Ex. 67 - Recology Food Waste Report (December Update)facilities.v' Closed or abandoned sites that might be available for new organic waste recycling facilities.Organic Waste Processing Capacity StudyFor theSan Francisco Bay Area RegionPrepared forRecologyWASTE ZEROPrepared by:Tint Compliance MtfWCMfNISacramenGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook