ielts rr volume12 report6
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: ielts rr volume12 report6
ielts rr volume12 report6
IELTSAn investigation of examiner rating of coherence and cohesion in the IELTS Academic Writing Task 2AuthorsFiona CottonKate WilsonUniversity of New ielts rr volume12 report6w South WalesUniversity of CanberraGrant awarded Round 14. 2008This study takes an in-depth look at the assessment of coherence and cohesion (CC) in the IELTS Academic Writing Task 2. It investigates the level of difficulty examiners experience, the features they look for, and the extent to which th ielts rr volume12 report6eir marking of co differs from their marking of other criteria. The impact of examiner qualifications, experience and training materials on assessmentielts rr volume12 report6
reliability is also examinedClick here to read the Introduction to this volume which includes an appraisal of this research, its context and impact.AIELTSAn investigation of examiner rating of coherence and cohesion in the IELTS Academic Writing Task 2AuthorsFiona CottonKate WilsonUniversity of New ielts rr volume12 report6an the marking of the other criteria, what features of cc examiners are looking for in marking Academic Writing Task 2; the extent to which they differ in their marking of cc compared to their marking of the other criteria, whether qualifications and experience had an impact on assessment reliabilit ielts rr volume12 report6y; and how much current examiner training materials clarify understandings of cc.The study involved think-aloud protocols and follow-up interviews witielts rr volume12 report6
h 12 examiners marking a set of 10 scripts, and a quantitative study with 55 examiners marking 12 scripts and completing a followup questionnaire.The IELTSAn investigation of examiner rating of coherence and cohesion in the IELTS Academic Writing Task 2AuthorsFiona CottonKate WilsonUniversity of New ielts rr volume12 report6le than the marking of Grammatical Range and Accuracy and Lexical Resoiuce. but not significantly different to Task Response. No significant effects could be foiuid for examiners' qualifications or experience, which suggests that the training is effective. The findings showed that examiners found th ielts rr volume12 report6e marking of cc more difficult than the other criteria.Examiners were conscientious in applying the band descriptors and used the terminology of the dielts rr volume12 report6
escriptors for cc most of the time. They also introduced other terms not explicitly used in the cc descriptors, such as 'flow', ‘structure’ and ‘linkiIELTSAn investigation of examiner rating of coherence and cohesion in the IELTS Academic Writing Task 2AuthorsFiona CottonKate WilsonUniversity of New ielts rr volume12 report6iation in the degree to which examiners focused on particular features of cc. has implications for rhe construct validity of the test.Suggestions for improving the construct validity include possible fine tuning of the cc band descriptors: clarification of the expected rhetorical genie, further ling ielts rr volume12 report6uistic research to provide detailed analysis of cc in sample texts; and refinements to the training materials, including a glossary of key terms and sielts rr volume12 report6
ample scripts showing all cohesive ties.1ELTS Research Reports Volume 12 •&www.ielts.org1An investigation of examiner rating of coherence and cohesionIELTSAn investigation of examiner rating of coherence and cohesion in the IELTS Academic Writing Task 2AuthorsFiona CottonKate WilsonUniversity of New ielts rr volume12 report6r in I English Communication ar the I university of New South Wales at the Australian Defence force Academy. She is founder of the Academic Language and Learning (ALL) Unit and coordinated the program liom 2006-2009. for which she won a Learning and Teaching Award in 2006. Before being employed in h ielts rr volume12 report6er current position, she taught 1 LSI. for many years in Asia and Australia. I ler current teaching and research interests include academic writing anielts rr volume12 report6
d literacy development hl university contexts. She has been an II J. IS examiner since 1991.KATE WILSONKate Wilson (MAI Ions. Dip lid, MEd by researchIELTSAn investigation of examiner rating of coherence and cohesion in the IELTS Academic Writing Task 2AuthorsFiona CottonKate WilsonUniversity of New ielts rr volume12 report6ogram at the University of Canberra, and I lead of rhe School of Languages and International Education. She has extensive experience in English language teaching and research, including 10 years as an IELTS Examiner, and 20 years' experience in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) both as teacher and ielts rr volume12 report6 teacher educator. Her doctoral research, as well as her masters by research, have both concealed international students' academic literacy.IELTS RESEielts rr volume12 report6
ARCH REPORTS, VOLUME 12, 2011Published by:Editor:Editorial consultant:Editorial assistance:Acknowledgements:IDP; IELTS Australia and British Council JIELTSAn investigation of examiner rating of coherence and cohesion in the IELTS Academic Writing Task 2AuthorsFiona CottonKate WilsonUniversity of New ielts rr volume12 report6 ESOL ExaminationsIDP: IELTS Australia Pty LimitedABN 84 008 664 766Level 8. 535 Bourke StMelbourne X'lC 3CCO. AustraliaTel+61 3 9612 4400Email:e'ts.communicaticns@idp ccmWebvAw.ielts.org£> ID3: IELTS Australia Pty Lim ted 2011British CouncilBridgewater House58 Whitworth st ielts rr volume12 report6IELTSAn investigation of examiner rating of coherence and cohesion in the IELTS Academic Writing Task 2AuthorsFiona CottonKate WilsonUniversity of NewGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook