morphological_agreement_realization_motivated_by_information_structure
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: morphological_agreement_realization_motivated_by_information_structure
morphological_agreement_realization_motivated_by_information_structure
Morphological Agreement Realization Motivated by Information Structure-Mayumi Hosono. Newcastle University1.IntroductionIt is a long tradition in gene morphological_agreement_realization_motivated_by_information_structureerative grammar that the semantic and phonological components are part of syntax, being input to actual semantic interpretation and actual phonological realization. This has been represented as the (reversed) Y-model (Chomsky 1981, 1995):-1Y-model:^J^Grammar (Syntax) Meaning 'Sounds(Semantics) (Phon morphological_agreement_realization_motivated_by_information_structureology)A theoretical assumption that this syntactic model yields is that what can be 'seen' as meaning and sound is what is translated from a syntacticmorphological_agreement_realization_motivated_by_information_structure
feature: as the mapping to the semantic component is independent of the mapping to the phonological component, there is no direct interaction betweenMorphological Agreement Realization Motivated by Information Structure-Mayumi Hosono. Newcastle University1.IntroductionIt is a long tradition in gene morphological_agreement_realization_motivated_by_information_structure which represents a grammatical information at more than one position of a sentence either by the same form or by a different form:-2My neck hurts.A subject my neck is the 3rd person singular, which information is doubly represented by -s attached to a verb hin t. Since the information of person is morphological_agreement_realization_motivated_by_information_structurealready expressed on a subject, it would not be necessary to express the same information on another sentential element once again; in that sense. MAmorphological_agreement_realization_motivated_by_information_structure
is redundant. In addition. MA itself does not affect sentential meaning. The reason why agreement has been regarded as syntactic is that there appearsMorphological Agreement Realization Motivated by Information Structure-Mayumi Hosono. Newcastle University1.IntroductionIt is a long tradition in gene morphological_agreement_realization_motivated_by_information_structure3rd person singular, appears, and vice versa. It is absolutely arbitrary' whether a language has MA. though: most of the European languages have MA. whereas the Asian languages like Japanese and Chinese do not have MA at all. It is also arbitrary how many MA a language has. Italian and Spanish have morphological_agreement_realization_motivated_by_information_structureMA in all persons and numbers; English has MA only for the 3rd person singular; French has a partial MA paradigm.■ Special thanks to Anders Holmberg fmorphological_agreement_realization_motivated_by_information_structure
or a long-term discussion of this issue, helpful suggestions, and a lot of advice, and Halldór Ả. Sigurdsson for detailed comments on a former versionMorphological Agreement Realization Motivated by Information Structure-Mayumi Hosono. Newcastle University1.IntroductionIt is a long tradition in gene morphological_agreement_realization_motivated_by_information_structurea relatively rich MA system allow null subjects more, whereas a language whose MA system is poor does not allow a subject to be null (Chomsky 1981, Burzio 1986, Rizzi 1982, 1986):-3a. Telefonera.telephone-3sg.FUT•He she will telephone.’(Ita.)b. ♦(He/she) will telephone.Italian, in which a verb infle morphological_agreement_realization_motivated_by_information_structurects for all persons, allow a subject to be empty (3a). whereas English, which has MA only for the 3rd person singular, does not allow empty subjects (morphological_agreement_realization_motivated_by_information_structure
3b). The situation is not so simple, however: languages like Chinese and Japanese that do not have MA at all may freely allow a subject to be null (JaMorphological Agreement Realization Motivated by Information Structure-Mayumi Hosono. Newcastle University1.IntroductionIt is a long tradition in gene morphological_agreement_realization_motivated_by_information_structureas any person, as illustrated in the translation. More complicated is the fact that even languages like Icelandic that have a relatively rich MA system may not allow an empty subject (Holmberg and Platzack 1995):-5*(Ég)sakna Ị?ín.(Ice.)I miss-Isg.PRES you‘I miss you.’The other tendency on subject MA morphological_agreement_realization_motivated_by_information_structure is that MA marking is obligatory when a subject is preverbal, whereas manifestation of MA is optional depending on particular languages when a subjecmorphological_agreement_realization_motivated_by_information_structure
t is postverbal (Rizzi 1982, Alexiadou and Anagnostopoulou 1998, Belletti 2001):-6a. Gianni ha telefonato.Gianni has-3sg telephoned 'Gianni telephonedMorphological Agreement Realization Motivated by Information Structure-Mayumi Hosono. Newcastle University1.IntroductionIt is a long tradition in geneMorphological Agreement Realization Motivated by Information Structure-Mayumi Hosono. Newcastle University1.IntroductionIt is a long tradition in geneGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook