KHO THƯ VIỆN 🔎

Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnf

➤  Gửi thông báo lỗi    ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạm

Loại tài liệu:     PDF
Số trang:         44 Trang
Tài liệu:           ✅  ĐÃ ĐƯỢC PHÊ DUYỆT
 













Nội dung chi tiết: Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnf

Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnf

Confronting Automated Law EnforcementLisa Shay, Woodrow Hartzog. John Nelson, Dominic Larkin, and Gregory ContiThe time has come for a cohesive approa

Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnfach to automated laic enforcement The ubiquity of sensors, advances in computerized analysis and robotics, and widespread adoption of networked techno

logies have paved the way for the combination of sensor systems with law enforcement algorithms and punishment feedback loops. While in the past, law Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnf

enforcement was manpower intensive and moderated by the discretion of the police officer on the beat, automated systems scale efficiently, allow metic

Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnf

ulous enforcement of the law, provide rapid dispatch of punishment and offer financial incentives to law enforcement agencies, governments, and purvey

Confronting Automated Law EnforcementLisa Shay, Woodrow Hartzog. John Nelson, Dominic Larkin, and Gregory ContiThe time has come for a cohesive approa

Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnfo society where many types of violations, particularly minor infractions, can be enforced with unprecedented rigor.This article provides a framework f

or analysis of automated law enforcement systems that includes a conceptualization of automated law enforcement as the process of automating some or a Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnf

ll aspects of surveillance, analysis, and enforcement in an iterative feedback loop. We demonstrate how intended and unintended consequences can resul

Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnf

t from the automation of any stage in this process and provide a list of issues that must be considered in any automated law enforcement scheme. Those

Confronting Automated Law EnforcementLisa Shay, Woodrow Hartzog. John Nelson, Dominic Larkin, and Gregory ContiThe time has come for a cohesive approa

Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnfards have been incorporated to minimize the potential for public harm while preserving the benefits of automation.4 2 2012 202 PM1Confronting Automate

d Lam Enforcement [2012Confronting Automated Law EnforcementLisa Shay,! Woodrow Hartzog,' John Nelson/ Dominic Larkin,' and Gregory Conti* 3 4 5Table Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnf

of ContentsIntroduction: The Rise of Automation...............................2I.Conceptualizing Automated Law Enforcement.......................6II.A

Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnf

Taxonomy of Automation Capabilities.........................91.Surveillance.................................................9a.Location..............

Confronting Automated Law EnforcementLisa Shay, Woodrow Hartzog. John Nelson, Dominic Larkin, and Gregory ContiThe time has come for a cohesive approa

Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnf....12d.Velocity................................................13e.Identification..........................................132.Analysis..............

.....................................183.Aggregation................................................194.Punishment.................................... Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnf

.............20III.Questions Necessary to Confront Automated Law Enforcement....221.Method of Implementation....................................222.Co

Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnf

ntrol....................................................233.Discretion.................................................244.Perfection of Enforcement.

Confronting Automated Law EnforcementLisa Shay, Woodrow Hartzog. John Nelson, Dominic Larkin, and Gregory ContiThe time has come for a cohesive approa

Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnf.........297- System Error/Malfunction....................................308.Administrative Burden......................................339.Procedura

l Safeguards......................................34a.Due Process.............................................34» Assistant Professor in the Departmen Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnf

t of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the US Military* Academy at West Point.s Assistant Professor at the Cumberland School of Law at Sa

Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnf

mford University: Affiliate Scholar at the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School.3Assistant Professor in the Department English and P

Confronting Automated Law EnforcementLisa Shay, Woodrow Hartzog. John Nelson, Dominic Larkin, and Gregory ContiThe time has come for a cohesive approa

Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnfitary Academy at West Point.Õ Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the US Military Academy at West

Point. Shay-EtAl-ConfrontingAutomatedLawEnf

Confronting Automated Law EnforcementLisa Shay, Woodrow Hartzog. John Nelson, Dominic Larkin, and Gregory ContiThe time has come for a cohesive approa

Gọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook