2 sepsis shock campus 2021
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: 2 sepsis shock campus 2021
2 sepsis shock campus 2021
ONLINE SPECIAL ARTICLESurviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis andSeptic Shock 2021KEY WORDS: adults; evidence-bas 2 sepsis shock campus 2021 sed medicine: guidelines; sepsis; septic shockINTRODUCTIONSepsis is life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection (1). Sepsis and septic shock are major healthcare problems, impacting millions of people around the world each year and killing between one in th 2 sepsis shock campus 2021 ree and one in six of those it affects (2-4). Early identification and appropriate management in the initial hours after the development of sepsis imp2 sepsis shock campus 2021
rove outcomes.The recommendations in this document are intended to provide guidance for the clinician caring for adult patients with sepsis or septic ONLINE SPECIAL ARTICLESurviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis andSeptic Shock 2021KEY WORDS: adults; evidence-bas 2 sepsis shock campus 2021 ique patients clinical variables. These guidelines are intended to reflect best practice (Table 1).(References 5-24 are referred to in the Methodology section which can be accessed at Supplemental Digital Content: Methodology.)SCREENING AND EARLY TREATMENTRecommendation1. For hospitals and health sy 2 sepsis shock campus 2021 stems, we recommend using a performance improvement program for sepsis, including sepsis screening for acutely ill, high-risk patients and standard op2 sepsis shock campus 2021
erating procedures for treatment.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence for screening.Strong recommendation, very low-quality evidence foONLINE SPECIAL ARTICLESurviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis andSeptic Shock 2021KEY WORDS: adults; evidence-bas 2 sepsis shock campus 2021 ' Lauralyn McIntyre8 Marties Ostcrmann* Hallie c. Prescott'0 Christa Schorr" Steven Simpson” w. Joost Wiersinga” Fayez Alshamsi'4 Derek c. Angus'4 Yaseen Arabi'8 Luciano Azcvodo'r Richard Beale'* Gregory Beilman'* Emilie Bclley-Cote20 Lisa Burry2' Maurizio Cecconi12 John Centofantl2’ Angel Coz Yatac 2 sepsis shock campus 2021 o24 Jan De Waele24 R. Phillip Dellinger2*Screening for Patients With Sepsis and Septic ShockRationaleSepsis performance improvement programs generally2 sepsis shock campus 2021
consist of sepsis screening, education, measurement of sepsis bundle performance, patient outcomes, and actions for identified opportunities (25, 26)ONLINE SPECIAL ARTICLESurviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis andSeptic Shock 2021KEY WORDS: adults; evidence-bas 2 sepsis shock campus 2021 were associated with better adherence to sepsis bundles along with a reduction in mortality (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.61-0.72) in patients with sepsis and septicThis article is being simultaneously published in Critical Care Medicine (DOI:https7/doiorg/10.l097/CCM.0000000000005337) and Intensive Care Me 2 sepsis shock campus 2021 dicine (DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/sOOl 34-021-06506-y).Copyright ■© 2021 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intens2 sepsis shock campus 2021
ive Care Medicine. All Rights Reserved.Critical Care Medicineocmpximal orge1063Evans et alshock (27). The specific components of performance improvemeONLINE SPECIAL ARTICLESurviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis andSeptic Shock 2021KEY WORDS: adults; evidence-bas 2 sepsis shock campus 2021 omote early identification of sepsis and consist of manual methods or automated use of the electronic health record (EHR). There is wide variation in diagnostic accuracy of these tools with most having poor predictive values, although the use of some was associated with improvements in care processe 2 sepsis shock campus 2021 s (28-31). A variety of clinical variables and tools are used for sepsis screening, such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, v2 sepsis shock campus 2021
ital signs, signs of infection, quick Sequential Organ Failure Score (qSOFA) or Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) criteria, National Early WaONLINE SPECIAL ARTICLESurviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis andSeptic Shock 2021KEY WORDS: adults; evidence-bas 2 sepsis shock campus 2021 is of 42,623 patients from seven studies for predicting hospital acquired sepsis the pooled area under the receiving operating curve (SAUROC) (0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.92); sensitivity (81%; 95% CI. 80-81), and specificity (72%; 95% CI, 72-72) was higher for machine learning than the sAUROC for traditio 2 sepsis shock campus 2021 nal screening tools such as SIRS (0.70), MEWS (0.50), and SOFA (0.78) (32).Screening tools may target patients in various locations, such as in-patien2 sepsis shock campus 2021
t wards, emergency departments, or ICUs (28-30,32). A pooled analysis of three RCTs did not demonstrate a mortality benefit of active screening (RR, 0ONLINE SPECIAL ARTICLESurviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis andSeptic Shock 2021KEY WORDS: adults; evidence-bas 2 sepsis shock campus 2021 t component of identifying sepsis early for timely intervention.Standard operating procedures are a set of practices that specify a preferred response to specific clinical circumstances (36). Sepsis standard operating procedures, initially specified as Early Goal Directed Therapy have evolved to “us 2 sepsis shock campus 2021 ual care” which includes a standard approach with components of the sepsis bundle, early identification, lactate, cultures, antibiotics, and fluids (32 sepsis shock campus 2021
7). A large study examined the association between implementation of state-mandated sepsis protocols, compliance, and mortality. A retrospective cohorONLINE SPECIAL ARTICLESurviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis andSeptic Shock 2021KEY WORDS: adults; evidence-bas 2 sepsis shock campus 2021 (30 months) implementation of New York state sepsis regulations, with a concurrent control population from four other states (38). In this comparative interrupted time series, mortality was lower in hospitals with higher compliance with achieving the sepsis bundles successfully.Lower resource count 2 sepsis shock campus 2021 ries may experience a different effect. A meta-analy-sis of two RCTs in Sub-Saharan Africa found higher mortality (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.00-1.58) with s2 sepsis shock campus 2021
tandard operating procedures compared with usual care, while it was decreased in one observational study (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]; 95% CI, 0.55-0.9ONLINE SPECIAL ARTICLESurviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis andSeptic Shock 2021KEY WORDS: adults; evidence-basONLINE SPECIAL ARTICLESurviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis andSeptic Shock 2021KEY WORDS: adults; evidence-basGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook