Luận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: Luận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015
Luận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015
UPPSALA UNIVERSiTETUPPSALA UNIVERSITÉT& VNU I NIVERSITYOF ECONOMICS & BUSINESS ------------------***----------MASTER THESIS OF MPPMPUBLIC EXPENDITURE Luận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015 REVIEW FOR THE NATIONAL PROGRAM FOR CHILDREN PROTECTION AT THE FIRST HALF OF PERIOD 2011 -2015Author:Lê Thu HoàngSupervisor:PhD. Lars-Torsten ErikssonLocal Supervisor: PhD. Hoàng Thị Thúy NguyệtClass:MPPM INTAKE 7Hanoi. January - 2015IACKNOWLEDGEMENTI would like to extend my sincere and heartfelt o Luận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015 bligation towards all the personages who helped me in the thesis. Without their active guidance, help, encouragement, I would not have made headway inLuận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015
the study.I offer may sincerest gratitude to my supervisors. Dr Nguyet and Dr Lar-Torsten, who has supported me thoughout my thesis.. One simply coulUPPSALA UNIVERSiTETUPPSALA UNIVERSITÉT& VNU I NIVERSITYOF ECONOMICS & BUSINESS ------------------***----------MASTER THESIS OF MPPMPUBLIC EXPENDITURE Luận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015 r giving me this opportunity.I would like to thank Bureau of Children Protection and Care, MOLISA and some local authorities for providing me with reference, interview and data sources.I also acknowledge with a deep sense of reverence, my gratitude towards my family who has always supported me moral Luận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015 ly as well as economically.At last but not least gratitude goes to all of my friends who directly or indirectly helped and contributed me ideas and coLuận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015
mments to complete this thesis.Respectfully,Lẽ Thu Hoàng2ABSTRACTTitle: PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW FOR THE NATIONAL PROGRAM FOR CHILDREN PROTECTION AT UPPSALA UNIVERSiTETUPPSALA UNIVERSITÉT& VNU I NIVERSITYOF ECONOMICS & BUSINESS ------------------***----------MASTER THESIS OF MPPMPUBLIC EXPENDITURE Luận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015 rsten ErikssonLocal Supervisor: PhD. Hoàng Thị Thúy NguyệtDate when the thesis is prcsented:on 6h December 2014Aim: Out of Vietnam’s 90 million inhabitants 29 % arc children. Of these about 1.5 million are considered to be children in specially difficult circumstances, rhe National Plan for Protecti Luận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015 on of Children in 2011-2015 aims at protecting children from violence, abuse and exploitation, rhe purpose of this study is to describe and review pubLuận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015
lic expenditure for NPCP for the first half of period 2011-2015. However, It need to defined clearly that: the result of review for whom? What is the UPPSALA UNIVERSiTETUPPSALA UNIVERSITÉT& VNU I NIVERSITYOF ECONOMICS & BUSINESS ------------------***----------MASTER THESIS OF MPPMPUBLIC EXPENDITURE Luận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015 for state management of this plan. Specifically, activities are assessed if they serve the objectives of the Plan and follow the timelime of the Plan framework. There are many methods to review public expenditure, for example, cost - benefit analysis. In this study, 5 indicators of evaluation metho Luận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015 d base on result-based management will be chose to analysis and review. This research only analyse in scope of project 3 about Child protection servicLuận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015
e models which MOLISA manages and monitors. Evaluated objects are results of the program and the degree of the program’s implementation.3Method:FirstlUPPSALA UNIVERSiTETUPPSALA UNIVERSITÉT& VNU I NIVERSITYOF ECONOMICS & BUSINESS ------------------***----------MASTER THESIS OF MPPMPUBLIC EXPENDITURE Luận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015 se on the approved program and knowledge, experience in management and monitoring the program, project 3 is rewrote according to Logical Framework.After that, the frame of reference rests on the theory of result-based evalutation and its five indicators of efficiency, effectiveness, impact, relevanc Luận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015 e and sustainability. Base on these five evaluated indicators, thisresearch collected secondary data, from mainly the MOLISA database, for statistics,Luận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015
comparisons of different periodical and technical evaluations, findings of surveys on protection and care for children, and in-depth interview (officUPPSALA UNIVERSiTETUPPSALA UNIVERSITÉT& VNU I NIVERSITYOF ECONOMICS & BUSINESS ------------------***----------MASTER THESIS OF MPPMPUBLIC EXPENDITURE Luận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015 a different approach. This study does not discuss that what method is better or more exact and so on. However, in this case, cost benefit analysis is pul on appendix 2 primarily, not deeply and completely. It is just to reference. In cost - benefit analysis, benefits and costs are expressed in monet Luận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015 ary' terms, and are adjusted for the time value of money, so that all flows of benefits and flows of project costs over time (which tend to occur at dLuận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015
ifferent points in lime) are expressed on a common basis in terms of their "net present value." It is very' difficult, time - consuming and expensive UPPSALA UNIVERSiTETUPPSALA UNIVERSITÉT& VNU I NIVERSITYOF ECONOMICS & BUSINESS ------------------***----------MASTER THESIS OF MPPMPUBLIC EXPENDITURE Luận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015 ch developed organizations such as WB, UNDP and Uniccf arc applying.Finally, SWOT analysis is used and recommendations for the project in the next time are proposed base on 5 evaluated indicators. Moreover, the future management method, RBM, will also be suggested. Luận văn thạc sĩ public expenditure review for the national program for children protection at the first half of period 2011 2015 UPPSALA UNIVERSiTETUPPSALA UNIVERSITÉT& VNU I NIVERSITYOF ECONOMICS & BUSINESS ------------------***----------MASTER THESIS OF MPPMPUBLIC EXPENDITUREGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook