Mereological foundation vs supervenience
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: Mereological foundation vs supervenience
Mereological foundation vs supervenience
Mereological Foundation vs. Supervenience?A Husserlian Proposal to Re-Think Moral Supervenience in Robert Audi's Ethical IntuitionismSonja Rinofner-Kr Mereological foundation vs supervenience reidlUnỉversỉtât Grazsonia.rinofner@uni-graz.atABSTRACT. The present essay takes issue with the idea of moral supervenience. It is argued that this idea is subject to fatal objections that can be brought to light by utilizing the resources of a phenomenological approach guided by demands of descript Mereological foundation vs supervenience ive authenticity and rational principles. This critical project is carried out by focusing on Robert Audi's sophisticated moderate ethical intuitionisMereological foundation vs supervenience
m which has rightly gained prominence recently. The relevant problems are addressed by comparing Audi’s notion of supervenience with Edmund Husserl's Mereological Foundation vs. Supervenience?A Husserlian Proposal to Re-Think Moral Supervenience in Robert Audi's Ethical IntuitionismSonja Rinofner-Kr Mereological foundation vs supervenience l's notion of foundation challenges the view that higher-order complex intentional unities like evaluative acts could be analyzed in terms of 'adding up' purely descriptive and non-descriptive contents. Or (choosing the current language of supervenience debates): in terms of anchoring moral properti Mereological foundation vs supervenience es in natural properties. My main thesis is that applying the idea of supervenience to the field of morality involves a circularity problem that underMereological foundation vs supervenience
mines the taken-for-granted presupposition of a clear-cut distinguishability of natural and moral properties. Appropriately specifying one's duties inMereological Foundation vs. Supervenience?A Husserlian Proposal to Re-Think Moral Supervenience in Robert Audi's Ethical IntuitionismSonja Rinofner-Kr Mereological foundation vs supervenience for morally assessing the situation in the first place. This practical task of solving the problem of moral salience, however, cannot be met by referring to pure facts that could be determined in an independent manner, that is, as uninfluenced by those moral perceptions or moral assessments whose ap Mereological foundation vs supervenience propriateness or permissibility, as assumed, is under consideration. Though we may grant that supervenience delivers a plausible general or abstract pMereological foundation vs supervenience
icture of how morality (as well as aesthetics, religion and other normative aspects) can be part of the world we experience, it does not help US propeMereological Foundation vs. Supervenience?A Husserlian Proposal to Re-Think Moral Supervenience in Robert Audi's Ethical IntuitionismSonja Rinofner-Kr Mereological foundation vs supervenience ghly suspicious idea.• the present essay greatly benefited fnrni aunments of audiences at the Universities of Heidelberg, Helsinki, Amsterdam and Krakow I am especially grateful to Robert Audi for his critical response to my Krakow presentation. Special thanks go to Paul Weingartner, Michael Wallner Mereological foundation vs supervenience and Harald Wiltsche who extensively commented on earlier drafts It goes without saying that I am responsible for all unclanttes or errors that may haMereological foundation vs supervenience
ve remainedMetodo. lnternation.ll Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy Vol. 3, n. 2 (2015) ISSN 2281-917782Sonịa Kinofner-KreidlContemporary theoriMereological Foundation vs. Supervenience?A Husserlian Proposal to Re-Think Moral Supervenience in Robert Audi's Ethical IntuitionismSonja Rinofner-Kr Mereological foundation vs supervenience rsus non-intentionalism. There are advocates of privileged access accounts who argue in favor of an irreducible first-person perspective and others who fervently deny it. Persistent disagreement exists concerning the conception of cognitive phenomenology, representationalism, higher-order theories o Mereological foundation vs supervenience f self-consciousness, qualia, and many other topics. Notwithstanding this widely split-up research scene, most contemporary philosophers unanimously tMereological foundation vs supervenience
ake the idea of supervenience as an essential component of a promising theory of human mind and human behavior. It is due to the vast extent of possibMereological Foundation vs. Supervenience?A Husserlian Proposal to Re-Think Moral Supervenience in Robert Audi's Ethical IntuitionismSonja Rinofner-Kr Mereological foundation vs supervenience articular.1The present essay takes Issue with this taken-for-granted view. It does so by utilizing phenomenological resources. The paper is divided into five parts. In part 1 1 give a sketchy view on the big picture that calls for supervenience. 1 ponder the motivation and theoretical background of Mereological foundation vs supervenience current debates on supervenience and, doing so, narrow down the range of my considerations to an exclusive concern for moral supervenĩence. I call toMereological foundation vs supervenience
mind, with a few rough brushes, the relevance and meaning of the chosen topic and indicate the interest it arouses from the point of view of two outstMereological Foundation vs. Supervenience?A Husserlian Proposal to Re-Think Moral Supervenience in Robert Audi's Ethical IntuitionismSonja Rinofner-Kr Mereological foundation vs supervenience lassic phenomenology fits into present debates 1 shortly explain Husserl's thesis of secondary naturalization which suitably characterizes the phenomenological approach with a view to current quarrels on naturalism and anti-naturalism. Part 2 introduces the notion of supervenience (SV) in Audi's eth Mereological foundation vs supervenience ical theory and the notion of mereologlcal foundation (ME) in Husserl’s phenomenology. I thereby focus on explaining the relating types of determinatiMereological foundation vs supervenience
on and clarifying basic conceptual distinctions. Having done so, 1 take up the issue of naturalism, proceeding from the widespread agreement that SV iMereological Foundation vs. Supervenience?A Husserlian Proposal to Re-Think Moral Supervenience in Robert Audi's Ethical IntuitionismSonja Rinofner-Kr Mereological foundation vs supervenience e explanations in the realm of moral phenomena zoithoul naturalizing moral properties. Though within a different general framework of philosophical theorizing, this account is akin to Husserl's phenomenological position, which endorses non-naturalism while, by the same1"The denial of the supervenien Mereological foundation vs supervenience ce of valuational concepts on factual characteristic* |...| would sever the essential connection between value and fact on which, it seems, the wholeMereological foundation vs supervenience
point *»i our vaiuaUonal activities depends. In the absence of such supervenlence, the very notion of valuation would lose its significance and relevaMereological Foundation vs. Supervenience?A Husserlian Proposal to Re-Think Moral Supervenience in Robert Audi's Ethical IntuitionismSonja Rinofner-Kr Mereological foundation vs supervenience 3token, acknowledging secondary naturalization of higher-order intentional contents. Part 3 broaches the issue whether Mb' and SV can be said to represent 'organic' or 'holistic' structures? I start with pinpointing the specifically 'organic' character Husserl attributes to consciousness in virtue o Mereological foundation vs supervenience f its rational structure. Based on the analogous functioning of a 'purely descriptive content' (Mb) and the subvenient (natural) properties (SV), 1 exMereological foundation vs supervenience
plain how precisely the phenomenological account challenges the distinction of natural and moral properties as it is presupposed in standard views of Mereological Foundation vs. Supervenience?A Husserlian Proposal to Re-Think Moral Supervenience in Robert Audi's Ethical IntuitionismSonja Rinofner-Kr Mereological foundation vs supervenience is connection I juxtappose the interlacing view via MF (Husserl) and the anchoring view via SV (Audi). Part 4 offers a more detailed analysis of how and why SV and MF represent different accounts of determining the functions of 'purely descriptive contents' (MF) and 'natural' properties (SV). Utiliz Mereological foundation vs supervenience ing the relating differences, 1 take up a thought presented in part 1 which overturns a widespread view: It is not moral properties that are primarilyMereological foundation vs supervenience
problematic but natural properties. 1 then argue that Audi's (and others') SV account implies an equivocal usage of 'natural property'. In order to fMereological Foundation vs. Supervenience?A Husserlian Proposal to Re-Think Moral Supervenience in Robert Audi's Ethical IntuitionismSonja Rinofner-Kr Mereological foundation vs supervenience ses the task of specifying principles which is central for an intuitionist ethics that pretends to adequately conceive of concrete practical conflicts based on an acknowledgement of value pluralism. Part 5 briefly summarizes the main results of the foregoing discussion.The critical purpose of this p Mereological foundation vs supervenience aper can be specified as follows: first, to indicate some internal difficulties of Audi's integration of SV in his metaethical theory; secondly, to drMereological foundation vs supervenience
aw on phenomenological resources, relating to Husserl's MF and its pertaining methodology of intentional analysis, for better understanding the probleMereological Foundation vs. Supervenience?A Husserlian Proposal to Re-Think Moral Supervenience in Robert Audi's Ethical IntuitionismSonja Rinofner-Kr Mereological foundation vs supervenience ative and moral experiences (or: acts) as complex phenomena in terms of involving2Among the controversial issues that might be traced here ts whether reference to 'organic' or 'holistic' structure. plays on the idea that a whole is more than the sum of its parts. 1 recognize that this Issue te relat Mereological foundation vs supervenience ed to important aspects that I cannot give prominence due to space restrictions This holds, for instance, for tire attempt to figure out tlx- role ofMereological foundation vs supervenience
emotions in moral perception. Doing so ts of crucial Importance for Husserl and other phenomenologlsts who refuse to accept the traditional oppositionGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook