(04.18) Three Signs That a Proposed Charter School Is at Risk of Failing
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: (04.18) Three Signs That a Proposed Charter School Is at Risk of Failing
(04.18) Three Signs That a Proposed Charter School Is at Risk of Failing
AKKILZUI/THREE SIGNS THATA PROPOSEDCHARTERSCHOOL IS ATRISK OF FAILINGBy Anna Nicotera and David Stuit, Basis Policy ResearchForeword and Summaryby Amb (04.18) Three Signs That a Proposed Charter School Is at Risk of Failingber M. Northern and Michael J. PetrilliFordham■ I N s T I T UT ET H O M A s_ B .FordhamINSTITUTEADVANCING EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCEThe Thomas B. Fordham Institute promotes educational excellence for every child in America via quality research, analysis, and commentary, as well as advocacy and exemplary (04.18) Three Signs That a Proposed Charter School Is at Risk of Failing charter school authorizing in Ohio. It is affiliated with the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, and this publication is a joint project of rhe Foundation(04.18) Three Signs That a Proposed Charter School Is at Risk of Failing
and the Institute. For further information, please visit our website Ct www.edexcellence.net. The Institute is neither connected with nor sponsored bAKKILZUI/THREE SIGNS THATA PROPOSEDCHARTERSCHOOL IS ATRISK OF FAILINGBy Anna Nicotera and David Stuit, Basis Policy ResearchForeword and Summaryby Amb (04.18) Three Signs That a Proposed Charter School Is at Risk of FailingRD & SUMMARYIt’s well established—by excellent work from the Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) and others—that some charter schools do far better than others at educating their students. This variability has profound implications for the children who attend those schools. Yet painful (04.18) Three Signs That a Proposed Charter School Is at Risk of Failing experience shows that rebooting or closing a low-performing school is a drawn-out and excruciating process that often backfires or simply doesn't hap(04.18) Three Signs That a Proposed Charter School Is at Risk of Failing
pen. But what if we could predict which schools arc likely not to succeed—before they even open their doors? If authorizers had that capability, they AKKILZUI/THREE SIGNS THATA PROPOSEDCHARTERSCHOOL IS ATRISK OF FAILINGBy Anna Nicotera and David Stuit, Basis Policy ResearchForeword and Summaryby Amb (04.18) Three Signs That a Proposed Charter School Is at Risk of Failingmploys an empirical approach to do just that. Analysts coded charter applications for casy-to-spot indicators and used them to predict the schools' academic performance in their first years of operation.Authorizers rejected 77 percent of applications from a sample of over 600 applications from four (04.18) Three Signs That a Proposed Charter School Is at Risk of Failingstates. They worked hard at screening those applications, seemingly homing in on a common set of indicators—"trigger warnings," if you will—whose pres(04.18) Three Signs That a Proposed Charter School Is at Risk of Failing
ence in or absence from applications made it more likely that they would reject the application.Yet despite the vigorous screening process that authorAKKILZUI/THREE SIGNS THATA PROPOSEDCHARTERSCHOOL IS ATRISK OF FAILINGBy Anna Nicotera and David Stuit, Basis Policy ResearchForeword and Summaryby Amb (04.18) Three Signs That a Proposed Charter School Is at Risk of Failing to charter schools that performed poorly during their first years of operation. Given that research has shown that a school's early-year performance almost always predicts its future performance, those weak schools are unlikely to improve.' (04.18) Three Signs That a Proposed Charter School Is at Risk of FailingAKKILZUI/THREE SIGNS THATA PROPOSEDCHARTERSCHOOL IS ATRISK OF FAILINGBy Anna Nicotera and David Stuit, Basis Policy ResearchForeword and Summaryby AmbGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook