Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity
Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity
Spelling's theory of symbolic kmgMflge: Forming (hẹ system of identityDaniel Whistlerhttps://khothuvien.cori!iiI have not yet succeeded in unravelling Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identityg the idea of the symbolical in poetry, but it seems to me that a great deal is contained in it. (Schiller in Schiller and Goethe 1914 1:458-9)Those who carry on combining - they can be called systematic eclectics.(Diderot 2011 283)iiiErefaifiF.W.J. Schelling's construction of symbolic language in § Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity73 of his Philosophic dcr Kunst sheds much needed light on both the history of the emergence of the symbol in theGoethezeit and Schelling's own philosSchelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity
ophical practice of the time? Such is the thesis defended in this book. As my argument progresses, it will become clear that both the peculiar theory Spelling's theory of symbolic kmgMflge: Forming (hẹ system of identityDaniel Whistlerhttps://khothuvien.cori!iiI have not yet succeeded in unravelling Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identitytherefore needs to be situated in terms of two critical debates: first, historical reconstructions of the symbol; second, philosophical reconstructions of Schelling's project.The fate of the symbol in the twentieth century has been far from propitious. In Musil’s Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften, for ins Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identitytance, the legacy of ‘the romantic symbol’" is characterised as follows by Ulrich, the novel’s protagonist,What they meant by ‘symbol’ was the great iSchelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity
mages of grace, which made everything that is confused and dwarfed in life... clear and great, images that suppress the noise of the senses and dip thSpelling's theory of symbolic kmgMflge: Forming (hẹ system of identityDaniel Whistlerhttps://khothuvien.cori!iiI have not yet succeeded in unravelling Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity many words, what a symbol was: first, because a symbol cannot be expressed in so many words; second, because Aryans do not deal in dry formulas, which is why they achieved only approximations of symbols during the last century; and third, because some11 use the underdetennined tern), GoethezeU, to Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identitydescribe this period of German thought, since the labels •Idealisin', •Romanticisin' and •Classicism' all suggest an artificial separation between SchSchelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity
elling and (for instance) Goethe or A.W. Schlegel.2As I will make clear in Chapter One, I place quotation marks around ‘romantic’ in this context to iSpelling's theory of symbolic kmgMflge: Forming (hẹ system of identityDaniel Whistlerhttps://khothuvien.cori!iiI have not yet succeeded in unravelling Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identityent moment of grace in the transcendent human being. (Musil 1995 338)Ulrich's reflections on the nationalist and racist appropriation of the idea of the symbol act out our post-romantic unease over the concept. It is a mysterious means of accessing the transcendent, a way of escaping this world into Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity an other-worldly realm of perfection; it is ineffable and so escapes rational criticism; it is bestowed upon a few world-historical individuals, therSchelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity
eby feeding into early twentieth-century fascistic and proto-fascistic discourse. The implication is not just that the symbol is a conservative relic Spelling's theory of symbolic kmgMflge: Forming (hẹ system of identityDaniel Whistlerhttps://khothuvien.cori!iiI have not yet succeeded in unravelling Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identityfollows, I make the case for a fresh recovery of the symbol. We need to re-attend to the emergence of the symbol in Goeihezeit Germany to uncover the diversity at its root. Not all theories of the symbol possessed the properties listed above, not all theories of the symbol could be appropriated by t Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identityhe political worldview Ulrich intimates. In fact, during the first fewyears of the nineteenth century the symbol was a site of experimentation: it wasSchelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity
theorised and re-theorised in radically conflicting ways for radically different ends. What we remember as the monolithic 'romantic' symbol did not eSpelling's theory of symbolic kmgMflge: Forming (hẹ system of identityDaniel Whistlerhttps://khothuvien.cori!iiI have not yet succeeded in unravelling Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identitynally demonstrating these claims by focusing on Schelling's theory of symbolic language. Schelling's theory is suited to this role because it has been so carelessly treated in the past by both historians of the symbol and Schelling scholars alike. Schelling is consistently (and falsely) taken to be Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identitya proponent of ‘the romantic symbol’ - and ahttps://khothuvien.cori!particularly poor proponent at that. Indeed, it is rare that the Schellingian symbSchelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity
ol is mentioned without accompanying accusations of plagiarism or, at least, unoriginality. Yet, a study of the place of the symbol (and, in particulaSpelling's theory of symbolic kmgMflge: Forming (hẹ system of identityDaniel Whistlerhttps://khothuvien.cori!iiI have not yet succeeded in unravelling Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identityaccounts of the symbol. Schellingian symbolic language is distinctive - peculiar, even - and this puts into question any unitary account of ‘the romantic symbol’ and its development. Schelling's theory is illustrative of the multiple experiments undertaken in the name of the symbol in the first few Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identityyears of the nineteenth century.The second critical debate in which this book intervenes concerns interpretations of Schelling's philosophy, for my coSchelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity
ncentration on Schelling's theory of symbolic language is not merely for the sake of historical accounts of the symbol alone, but is also intended as Spelling's theory of symbolic kmgMflge: Forming (hẹ system of identityDaniel Whistlerhttps://khothuvien.cori!iiI have not yet succeeded in unravelling Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identitytem. by means of a focus on the role the symbol plays therein. This period of Schelling's philosophical output has been seriously neglected over the last thirty years and stands in need of critical attention. To begin to remedy this situation, 1 provide a detailed reconstruction of the system which Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identitySchelling developed in his writings between 1801 and 1805. Moreover, I go on to argue that the concept of symbolic language illuminates Schelling's meSchelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity
taphilosophical practice. Unlike Hegel, Fichte and Maimon, Schelling is often reticent about what he is doing when he writes philosophy; the concept oSpelling's theory of symbolic kmgMflge: Forming (hẹ system of identityDaniel Whistlerhttps://khothuvien.cori!iiI have not yet succeeded in unravelling Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity the words on the page of a philosophy text in forming a system.The contribution that an analysis of §73 of the Philosophic der Kunst can make to these twovicritical debates (understanding the history of the symbol and understanding Schelling's Identitdtssystem) explains why I place so much emphasis Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity in what follows on this short, unassuming paragraph from a set of posthumously-published lecture notes. §73 of the Philosophic der Kunst, when read iSchelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity
n the context of the emergence of the symbol and the monistic rigour of the Identitatssystcm, is a hidden gem in Schelling's output. And while one shoSpelling's theory of symbolic kmgMflge: Forming (hẹ system of identityDaniel Whistlerhttps://khothuvien.cori!iiI have not yet succeeded in unravelling Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identitygree that it deserves the central position I have given it.♦ *Over the course of the book. 1 approach Schelling's construction of symbolic language in §73 of his Philosophic der Kunst in three ways. First, I compare Schellingian symbolic language to other contemporary theories of the symbol and lang Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identityuage (in particular, those of Goethe. Kant and A.w. Schlegel). While Schelling’s theory of symbolic language possesses properties similar to these othSchelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity
er theories (the identity of being and meaning, organic wholeness, the coexistence of opposites). I show that it differs in how those properties are iSpelling's theory of symbolic kmgMflge: Forming (hẹ system of identityDaniel Whistlerhttps://khothuvien.cori!iiI have not yet succeeded in unravelling Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identitylanguage. Three tenets from the Identitutssystcm are crucial: formation, quantitative differentiation and construction. They illuminate why Schelling interprets symbolic language very differently to his contemporaries. Third, I consider the metaphilosophical significance of Schellingian symbolic lan Schelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identityguage. This significance is twofold. First, his theory gives rise to a conception of discourse without reference, and so to the notion of a science wiSchelling''s theory of symbolic language Forming the system of identity
thout reference? On this basis, Schelling criticises current practices of science for remaining too concerned with referring to reality,3'Science is hSpelling's theory of symbolic kmgMflge: Forming (hẹ system of identityDaniel Whistlerhttps://khothuvien.cori!iiI have not yet succeeded in unravellingGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook