U.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Region
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: U.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Region
U.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Region
HARVARD UNIVERSITY JOHN F. KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT Caspian Studies ProgramEEEA Report from the Caspian Studies Program’s Conference Held on Octob U.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Regionber 22-23,2000U.S.-Russian Relations:Implications for the Caspian RegionWith an Executive Memorandum by Brenda Shaffer Summarizing Key Findings and Policy RecommendationsCaspian Studies Program, Harvard University Cambridge. Massachusetts June 2001PREFACEDear Colleague,On the eve of the U.S. Preside U.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Regionntial elections. Harvard University’s Caspian Studies Program held a conference in Cambridge titled “U.S.-Russian Relations: Implications for the CaspU.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Region
ian Region" (October 22-23,2000). Security studies specialists, experts on the Caspian region, and past and present U.S. and Russian policymakers atteHARVARD UNIVERSITY JOHN F. KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT Caspian Studies ProgramEEEA Report from the Caspian Studies Program’s Conference Held on Octob U.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Regionssions about the impact of great and regional power rivalry on the slate of conf lict, stability, and development.Recent changes in the area make the current period an especially opportune one for exploring how U.S. and Russian relations affect the Caspian region. Under President Putin, Russia has a U.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Regionrticulated and initialed a more coherent policy toward the Caspian region, significantly increasing its activities there. Moscow’s recent change in poU.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Region
licy suggests that Russian policymakers now believe that Russia can achieve more influence in the region by demonstrating flexibility on key issues. OHARVARD UNIVERSITY JOHN F. KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT Caspian Studies ProgramEEEA Report from the Caspian Studies Program’s Conference Held on Octob U.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian RegionOn the other. Russia’s more centralized and coherent policy should facilitate the negotiating of cooperative arrangements with Moscow.A number of policy recommendations emerged from the conference that should help the new U.S. Administration promote U.S. interests without contributing to the destabi U.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Regionlization of the region or to worsening relations with Russia (outcomes which are clearly in conflict with overall U.S. interests). The Executive MemorU.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Region
andum of this report summarizes these policy recommendations as well as the main findings of the conference. The report also includes summaries of theHARVARD UNIVERSITY JOHN F. KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT Caspian Studies ProgramEEEA Report from the Caspian Studies Program’s Conference Held on Octob U.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Regionavanaugh and Anatoly Adamishin.This report has been compiled and edited by Emily Van Buskirk, Patrick McCrann, and Robert Krikorian, with proofreading assistance from Seth Jaffe. Please feel free to direct any comments or questions about the report or its recommendations to Brenda Shaffer, Research U.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian RegionDirector of the Caspian Studies Program, 79 JFK Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, or Brenda_Shaiier@harvard.edu.rhe Caspian Studies Program is made possiblU.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Region
e by a generous grant from the U.S.-A/.erbaijan Chamber of Commerce and a consortium of companies led by ExxonMobil, Chevron, Aker-Maritime, ccc, and HARVARD UNIVERSITY JOHN F. KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT Caspian Studies ProgramEEEA Report from the Caspian Studies Program’s Conference Held on Octob U.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Region Program will continue to explore the issues of vital interest to the Caspian basin region, including the many ways in which the U.S.-Russian relationship impacts the peoples and situations on the ground. We will continue to engage governments, the press, NGOs, companies, and academic experts in the U.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Region in the hopes that the answers to these questions can positively inform U.S. policyiiitoward the region. We hope that you will find this report usefulU.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Region
as you contemplate U.S.-Russian relations, the strategic Caspian region, and United States policy overall. We look forward to hearing your suggestionHARVARD UNIVERSITY JOHN F. KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT Caspian Studies ProgramEEEA Report from the Caspian Studies Program’s Conference Held on Octob U.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Regionector, Caspian Studies ProgramivTABLE OF CONTENTSPreface................................................................... liiExecutive Memorandum by Brenda Shaffer.................................... 2Panel One: Introduction and History'...................................... 8Introducers: Graham A U.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Regionllison. Melissa Can. Brenda Shaffer: Panelists: Carol Saivetz.Mark Kramer. Gerard LibaridianPanel Two: U.S. Policy and Activity in the Caspian Region.U.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Region
.................... 12Chair: John Reppert; Panelists: Ambassador Carey Cavanaugh, Anthony Richter, John ElkindPanel Three: Russian Policy and ActivitHARVARD UNIVERSITY JOHN F. KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT Caspian Studies ProgramEEEA Report from the Caspian Studies Program’s Conference Held on Octob U.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Region Anatoly Adamishin, Fiona Hill, Brenda ShafferPanel Four: Lessons about the Nature of Power in the Caspian Region.......20Chair: Paul Goble; Panelists: Steven Walt, Arman GrigorianPanel Five: Models for U.S.-Russian Interaction in the Caspian Region:Impact on Stability and Conflict.................. U.S.-Russian Relations Implications for the Caspian Region............................ 24HARVARD UNIVERSITY JOHN F. KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT Caspian Studies ProgramEEEA Report from the Caspian Studies Program’s Conference Held on OctobHARVARD UNIVERSITY JOHN F. KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT Caspian Studies ProgramEEEA Report from the Caspian Studies Program’s Conference Held on OctobGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook