KHO THƯ VIỆN 🔎

School to Prison Pipeline with CAO Response 20166

➤  Gửi thông báo lỗi    ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạm

Loại tài liệu:     PDF
Số trang:         57 Trang
Tài liệu:           ✅  ĐÃ ĐƯỢC PHÊ DUYỆT
 













Nội dung chi tiết: School to Prison Pipeline with CAO Response 20166

School to Prison Pipeline with CAO Response 20166

Report Number 2016-6March 1,2016The School-to-PrisonPipeline inMontgomery CountyElaine Bonner-TompkinsLeslie Rubin Kristen Latham^Office of Legislativ

School to Prison Pipeline with CAO Response 20166 ve OversightThe Schoobto-Prison Pipeline in Montgomery CountyExecutive Summary of OLO Report Number 2016-6March 1. 2016Summary: The School-to-Prison P

ipeline refers to the increased risk of juvenile delinquency and criminal justice system involvement among children who have been suspended or expelle School to Prison Pipeline with CAO Response 20166

d from school. Nationally, the criminalization of minor school-based infractions and the over-representation of youth of color and students with disab

School to Prison Pipeline with CAO Response 20166

ilities are key features of the School-to-Prison Pipeline. This report seeks to improve the County Council's understanding of the School-to-Prison Pip

Report Number 2016-6March 1,2016The School-to-PrisonPipeline inMontgomery CountyElaine Bonner-TompkinsLeslie Rubin Kristen Latham^Office of Legislativ

School to Prison Pipeline with CAO Response 20166 e, ethnicity, gender, and special education status, but the Pipeline is shrinking. OLO also found that while many local agency practices align with be

st practices for stemming for the Pipeline, opportunities exist for improving local practices that include engaging community stakeholders and improvi School to Prison Pipeline with CAO Response 20166

ng data systems to track performance outcomes and to support program improvements.The Pipeline in Montgomery CountyData on key contact points in the s

School to Prison Pipeline with CAO Response 20166

chool discipline and juvenile justice systems suggest that the School-to-Pnson Pipeline in Montgomery County' is small and shrinking. Montgomery Count

Report Number 2016-6March 1,2016The School-to-PrisonPipeline inMontgomery CountyElaine Bonner-TompkinsLeslie Rubin Kristen Latham^Office of Legislativ

School to Prison Pipeline with CAO Response 20166 te in the state. Juvenile arrests in Montgomery County have also decreased, as have intakes at the Department of Juvenile Senices (DJS). referrals to

the Comity's juvenile justice diversion programs, and the number of juvenile delinquency cases adjudicated by the Circuit Court.Summary of Data Trends School to Prison Pipeline with CAO Response 20166

for School-to-Prison Pipeline Contact Points% ChangeMCPS Data Points (School Years)20112015- School Removal Incidents49002447-0,5- Unduplicated Count

School to Prison Pipeline with CAO Response 20166

of Students Removed36741.S04-0,51- Percentage of Students Removed from School2.61.2-0,54Juvenile Arrest Data Points (Fiscal Years)20122015- Number of

Report Number 2016-6March 1,2016The School-to-PrisonPipeline inMontgomery CountyElaine Bonner-TompkinsLeslie Rubin Kristen Latham^Office of Legislativ

School to Prison Pipeline with CAO Response 20166 es43693672-0,16Circuit Court Data Points (Fiscal Years)20112014- Delinquency Cases42452354-0,45SASCA Data Points (Fiscal Years)20112015- Youth Screene

d by SASCA761591-0,22Teen Court Data Points (Fiscal Years)20122014- Referrals to Teen Court387331-0,14It hat drives the County’s Schooi-to-Prison Pipe School to Prison Pipeline with CAO Response 20166

line? Local stakeholders identified several risk factors for youth involvement in the School-to-Prison Pipeline including: peer pressure, family issue

School to Prison Pipeline with CAO Response 20166

s, unemployment, substance abuse, impulsiveness, trauma, school failure, and aggressive law enforcement.Data show that 90 percent of out-of-school rem

Report Number 2016-6March 1,2016The School-to-PrisonPipeline inMontgomery CountyElaine Bonner-TompkinsLeslie Rubin Kristen Latham^Office of Legislativ

School to Prison Pipeline with CAO Response 20166 Very few children are charged with the most serious offenses that include sex offenses, arson, or aggravated assault Similarly, three in four cases re

ferred to DJS are for misdemeanors and status offenses.Out-of-school removals are also concentrated among a subset of MCPS secondary schools and arres School to Prison Pipeline with CAO Response 20166

ts are concentrated among a subset of MCPS high schools. In 2015. eight of 38 middle schools accounted for nearly a half of all out-of-school removals

School to Prison Pipeline with CAO Response 20166

at the middle school level and six of 25 high schools accounted for 60 percent of all high school arrests.Demographics of (he Pipeline in Mon I go me

Report Number 2016-6March 1,2016The School-to-PrisonPipeline inMontgomery CountyElaine Bonner-TompkinsLeslie Rubin Kristen Latham^Office of Legislativ

Report Number 2016-6March 1,2016The School-to-PrisonPipeline inMontgomery CountyElaine Bonner-TompkinsLeslie Rubin Kristen Latham^Office of Legislativ

Gọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook