KHO THƯ VIỆN 🔎

Events and the Semantic Content of Thematic Relations

➤  Gửi thông báo lỗi    ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạm

Loại tài liệu:     WORD
Số trang:         109 Trang
Tài liệu:           ✅  ĐÃ ĐƯỢC PHÊ DUYỆT
 













Nội dung chi tiết: Events and the Semantic Content of Thematic Relations

Events and the Semantic Content of Thematic Relations

In press in Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter, eds., Logical Form, Language & Semantic Content: On Contemporary' Developments in the Philosophy of Language

Events and the Semantic Content of Thematic Relationse & Linguistics.Events and the Semantic Content of Thematic RelationsBarry ScheinUniversity of Southern CaliforniaMC-1693Los Angeles, cA 90089-1693 sc

hein@usc.edu36513In Davidson (1967,1985), Castatleda (1967) and Parsons (1985,1990), theproblem of variable polyadicity as reflected in the inferentia Events and the Semantic Content of Thematic Relations

l relations among thesentences in (1) is treated by a decomposition of the common predicate stab.(1) a.b.c.d.e.Brutus stabbed Caesar in the back with

Events and the Semantic Content of Thematic Relations

a knife. (Parsons 1990)Brutus stabbed Caesar in the back.Brutus stabbed Caesar with a knife.Brutus stabbed Caesar.Brutus stabbed.(a)entails (b) & (c)

In press in Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter, eds., Logical Form, Language & Semantic Content: On Contemporary' Developments in the Philosophy of Language

Events and the Semantic Content of Thematic Relations.(d)& (e) does not entail (c).(e)does not entail (d).-23e stab(e, Brutus, Caesar, the back, a knife).srub(cxy,z,w) is true of iff stab(e)

& stabber(e.b) & stabbee(e.c) & in(e.d) & with(e.k)Let’s call any relation to events, R(e^), a thematic relation, among which are stabber(e.x), stabbe Events and the Semantic Content of Thematic Relations

e(e,x), in(e.x) and with(e,k). For the inferences of (1), the decomposition into thematic relations can remain lexical as in (2), or it can be carried

Events and the Semantic Content of Thematic Relations

over into the syntax as in (3).-33e(stab(e) & stabber(e, Brutus) & stabbee(e, Caesar) & in(e, the back) &with(e, a knife))Barry Schein, Events and th

In press in Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter, eds., Logical Form, Language & Semantic Content: On Contemporary' Developments in the Philosophy of Language

Events and the Semantic Content of Thematic Relations be syntactic. In Plurals and Events, I called this radical decomposition essential separation. Observe in (5) that the terms decomposing the verb, co

vered e,x] and cover(e’), apply to different events and they are separated by elements from elsewhere in the sentence: the quantifiers two workbenches Events and the Semantic Content of Thematic Relations

and each include within their scope cover(e’) but not covcrer[e,X].-4a. Three hundred quilt patches covered over two workbenches each with two bedspr

Events and the Semantic Content of Thematic Relations

eads.b. Three video games taught every quarterback two new plays.

In press in Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter, eds., Logical Form, Language & Semantic Content: On Contemporary' Developments in the Philosophy of Language

In press in Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter, eds., Logical Form, Language & Semantic Content: On Contemporary' Developments in the Philosophy of Language

Gọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook