Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validity
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validity
Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validity
Running Kcad: EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT RACIAL ATTITVDES: A TEST OF THEIR CONVERGENT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITYExplicit and Implicit Racial Attitudes:A Test Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validity of their Convergent and Predictive ValidityShanto Iyengar and Solomon Messing. Stanford UniversityKyu Halm. Seoul National UniversityMahzarin Banaji and Cluistopher Dial, Harvard UniversityRuiuung head: EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT RACIAL ATTITUDES: A TEST OF THEIR CONVERGENT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITYAbstra Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validityctUsing data from national samples, we examine the convergent and predictive validity of explicit and implicit measures of racial prejudice. First. weExplicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validity
show that explicit measures diverge from a measure of implicit racial bias. The number of respondents classified as prejudiced on the implicit measurRunning Kcad: EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT RACIAL ATTITVDES: A TEST OF THEIR CONVERGENT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITYExplicit and Implicit Racial Attitudes:A Test Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validity. Second. Ill tliree different experimental contexts, we demonstrate that implicit racial bias predicts a preference for individuals with lighter complexions. People classified as prejudiced on the basis of explicit measures, however, do not discriminate on the basis of complexion. Our findings sugg Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validityest that future efforts to assess prejudice should incorporate both implicit and explicit racial attitudes.The measurement of Americans' racial attituExplicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validity
des has become especially challenging in the post-civil lights era because survey respondents arc motivated to answer questions in a manner that suggeRunning Kcad: EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT RACIAL ATTITVDES: A TEST OF THEIR CONVERGENT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITYExplicit and Implicit Racial Attitudes:A Test Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validitytory terms (c.g. “lazy”) to describe African-Americans has declined sharply since rhe 1960s (Gaertner and Dovidio 2005; Virtancn and lluddy 1998; laylor. Shcalslcy. and Greeley 1978). and by the cud of (he twentieth century, whites evaluated blacks just as favorably as their own group. But survey qu Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validityestions that disguise the racial cue elicit higher levels of prejudice (Kukhnski and Cobb. 1998; Crosby cl al.. 1980). Tn one snidy with unobtrusive mExplicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validity
easures, rhe authors concluded that "blatantly prejudiced attitudes still pervade the white population" (Kukhnski et al. 1997. p. 403). Thus, when peoRunning Kcad: EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT RACIAL ATTITVDES: A TEST OF THEIR CONVERGENT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITYExplicit and Implicit Racial Attitudes:A Test Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validityies.Evidence of lingering racial bias in Americans' policy preferences raises further doubts about the decline of prejudice (see Fording 2003; Quillian 2006). In the case of crime, support for punitive policies increases significantly when whites leant that the criminal perpetrator is non-U hitc (Gi Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validitylliam and Iyengar 2000; Pcffley and Hurwitz 2007; Eberhardt cl al. 2001). Race bias also characterizes a variety of economic markets (Ayres. 2001); joExplicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validity
b applicants with European-sounding find names arc preferred (by 50 percent) over applicants with identical resumes but African American-sounding nameRunning Kcad: EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT RACIAL ATTITVDES: A TEST OF THEIR CONVERGENT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITYExplicit and Implicit Racial Attitudes:A Test Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validityse.Partly in response to normative and impression management pressures, survey' researchers have shitted the definition of prejudice away from explicit racial animus in the2direction of more indirect and diffuse indicators of “symbolic racism” or "racial resentment.” In this revisionist view, prejud Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validityice in the contemporary era is more appropriately defined as a blend of racial animosity and mainstream cultural values (Kinder and Sears. 1981). OperExplicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validity
ationally, the blend is captured by survey questions that focus on beliefs about minorities* adherence to the American way (Kinder and Sanders 19961 FRunning Kcad: EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT RACIAL ATTITVDES: A TEST OF THEIR CONVERGENT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITYExplicit and Implicit Racial Attitudes:A Test Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validitythere IS understandable concern over then measurement validity. Do they, in fact, measure racial prejudice or some other construct related to prejudice? Proponents cite the close relationship between these measures and a variety of race-related attitudes and policy preferences, e g. lacial stereotyp Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validityes, support for affirmative action, etc. (see Kinder and Sanders 1996: Sears and Henry 2005; Tesler and Sears 2010) as evidence of their predictive vaExplicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validity
lidity. Critics challenge this interpretation on the ground that the manifest content of the racial resentment questions - which encompasses both prejRunning Kcad: EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT RACIAL ATTITVDES: A TEST OF THEIR CONVERGENT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITYExplicit and Implicit Racial Attitudes:A Test Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validityn and Carmines 1997). In the most recent critique along these hues. Carmines et al. argue that the criterion measiues used to assess the predictive validity of new racism (e g. support for affirmative action) may in fact be alternative indicators of the same underlying construct. Then analysis demon Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validitystrates that the survey' Items making up the racial resentment scale consistently load on the same underlying factor as a variety of racial policy queExplicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validity
stions. Carmines et al. therefore conclude that "both the racial resentment and racial3policy measures measure a single underlying dimension, not two Running Kcad: EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT RACIAL ATTITVDES: A TEST OF THEIR CONVERGENT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITYExplicit and Implicit Racial Attitudes:A Test Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validitymeasures of racial bias We used two validation tests. First, we correlated survey measures of prejudice with an implicit measure that is not subject to conscious control. We foiuid that the survey measures correlated only weakly with implicit bias. Second, we assessed the validity of explicit and im Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validityplicit measures based on their ability to predict a participant's choice between two nonwhite individuals who were identical in all respects except foExplicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validity
r then degree of Afrocentric physical featrues (primarily skin complexion). Our logic was that white respondents classified as racially prejudiced, shRunning Kcad: EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT RACIAL ATTITVDES: A TEST OF THEIR CONVERGENT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITYExplicit and Implicit Racial Attitudes:A Test Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validitytures, but the survey measures had no bearing on responsiveness to the visual racial cue: indeed, the participants classified as more prejudiced on the survey measures were "color blind" in their preferences.The paper is organized as follows. We begin with a brief discussion of the distinction betwe Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validityen implicit and explicit racial attitudes. We then describe our indicators of lacial prejudice, both implicit and explicit. Next, we present results oExplicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validity
f a convergent validity analysis, which compares racial attitudes with candidate evaluations While explicit and implicit measures of candidate prefereRunning Kcad: EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT RACIAL ATTITVDES: A TEST OF THEIR CONVERGENT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITYExplicit and Implicit Racial Attitudes:A Test Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validityhat the divergence cannot be attributed simply to differences 111 measurement modality, but must represent an underlying behavioral reality. Last, we report the results from three predictive validity tests in1 Using the American National Election Studies data. Cai mines et al. leplicate then analysi Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validitys on seven different election years With consistent results.4which respondents indicated then preference as between candidates for elective office orExplicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validity
prospective immigrants. Ill each case, we used morplring software to vary the level of Airocentiism 111 the target individuals’ faces. Our results shoRunning Kcad: EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT RACIAL ATTITVDES: A TEST OF THEIR CONVERGENT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITYExplicit and Implicit Racial Attitudes:A Test Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validity, while those with higher levels of prejudice according to the survey measures were unresponsive to the racial cue. i.e. they tieated the more and less Afrocentric targets uniformly. In closing, we discuss the implications of our findings for the study of race and politics.Implicit Versus Explicit R Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validityacial AttitudesThe measurement of racial attitudes has long interested social psychologists, but not because of concerns that people may deliberatelyExplicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validity
misrepresent then attitudes. Instead. It IS largely assumed that conscious aspects of attitudes and beliefs I epl esent but a thin sliver of the mind'Running Kcad: EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT RACIAL ATTITVDES: A TEST OF THEIR CONVERGENT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITYExplicit and Implicit Racial Attitudes:A Test Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validitytside conscious awareness, but also that unintentional thought and feeling may be the dominant mode of operation (Bargli 1999). Based on this evidence, psychologists now believe that the mind’s architecture precludes introspective access for the most part and have therefore sought to develop measure Explicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validitys of attitudes and beliefs that exist independent of conscious attitudes (see Banaji and Heiphetz 2010. for a review) Explicit racial attitudes may orExplicit and implicit racial attitudes a test of their convergent and predictive validity
may not leflect genuine conscious racial preferences, but 111 either case they shed no light on less conscious or implicit preferences.There is a rapGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook