Joint development agreements of offshore
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: Joint development agreements of offshore
Joint development agreements of offshore
(2011 Number 1)60China Oceans Law ReviewJoint Development Agreements of Offshore Hydrocarbon Deposits:An Alternative to Maritime Delimitation in the A Joint development agreements of offshore Asia-Pacific RegionVasco Becker- Weinberg *Abstract: In the past years.the availability of the technology that allows for the exploitation of offshore resources at depths that were recently unreachable to mankind and the desire to extend national jurisdiction in order to secure access to non-living Joint development agreements of offshore marine natural resources.has resulted in an increase of coastal States’ claims over maritime areas and in particular over the continental shelf.AmongsJoint development agreements of offshore
t the different regions of the planet, the Asia-Pacific region is a clear example of a situation where the potential development of offshore hydrocarb(2011 Number 1)60China Oceans Law ReviewJoint Development Agreements of Offshore Hydrocarbon Deposits:An Alternative to Maritime Delimitation in the A Joint development agreements of offshore ber of maritime boundaries that have been delimitated in this region and.on the other hand, the growing need for energy sources, the right to develop offshore hydrocarbon deposits is a key issue for the States in the Asia-Pacific region.Notwithstanding the fact that contemporary public international Joint development agreements of offshore law. and in particular law of the sea.does not provide a straight forward solution for the settlement of such disputes.State practice and some internJoint development agreements of offshore
ational jurisprudence have considered interim measures pending maritime delimitation.In some cases, interim measures such as joint development agreeme(2011 Number 1)60China Oceans Law ReviewJoint Development Agreements of Offshore Hydrocarbon Deposits:An Alternative to Maritime Delimitation in the A Joint development agreements of offshore s. This was,, ,, Joint Development Agreements ol Oilshore HydrocarlxAn Alternative to Maritime Delimitation in the Asia-Pacific Region 61Thailand.Therefore.despite the legal disparities of known joint development agreements of offshore hydrocarbon deposits and the fact that the respective concept an Joint development agreements of offshore d legal nature is far from being homogcnous.it is possible, after a comprehensive legal analysis of the different agreements.to present a legal solutiJoint development agreements of offshore
on a-dapted to the specific circumstances of the Asia-Pacific region, that could ultimately lead to an economic.political and social improvement of th(2011 Number 1)60China Oceans Law ReviewJoint Development Agreements of Offshore Hydrocarbon Deposits:An Alternative to Maritime Delimitation in the A Joint development agreements of offshore n and Development ofOffshore Hydrocarbon DepositsThe location and nature of offshore hydrocarbon deposits, in particular their mobility through geological layers of the subsoil which allows these resources to move freely between the pore spaces of rock and the impossibility of their confinement to a Joint development agreements of offshore certain area, raises important and particular legal questions regarding their common development by two or more States.Under current law of the sea.SJoint development agreements of offshore
tates exercise different rights depending on the legal regime applicable to each maritime space, in particular regarding the development of living and(2011 Number 1)60China Oceans Law ReviewJoint Development Agreements of Offshore Hydrocarbon Deposits:An Alternative to Maritime Delimitation in the A Joint development agreements of offshore therein. regardless of prior proclamation or(2011 Number 1 )62China Oceans Law Reviewoccupation of this maritime space. Whereas.in the EEZ.Slates’ rights depend on prior proclamation by the relevant coastal State and should be considered as mere rights of fruition when compared with the regime of t Joint development agreements of offshore he continental shelf.and in particular in what concerns States' sovereignty regarding the development of resources. ®Under UNCLOS the criteria of distJoint development agreements of offshore
ance were adopted for the purpose of delimitation of the continental shelf and in order to achieve an equitable result, contrary to the physical chara(2011 Number 1)60China Oceans Law ReviewJoint Development Agreements of Offshore Hydrocarbon Deposits:An Alternative to Maritime Delimitation in the A Joint development agreements of offshore hat delimitation should be carried out with the use of a median line, safe for special circumstances that might justify its amendment. such as the presence of third(Đ Article 77 (2) in fine (3) of UNCLOS. See Nguyen Quoc DINH.Patrick DAILLER and Alain PELLE I . Droil Internationa/ Public . 7"‘ cd.. Joint development agreements of offshore Paris: Librairie Generate de Doit Ct de Jurisprudence/E. J. A. .2002.p. 1192: Victor PRESCOTT. National rights to hydrocarbon resources of the contineJoint development agreements of offshore
ntal margin beyond 200 nautical miles, in Gerald BLAKE. Martin PRATT,( live SCHOFIELD and Janet Allison BROWN cd.. boundaries and Energy i Problems an(2011 Number 1)60China Oceans Law ReviewJoint Development Agreements of Offshore Hydrocarbon Deposits:An Alternative to Maritime Delimitation in the A Joint development agreements of offshore rican Journal of international LflWtVol. 4.1992.pp. 767 — 768: Rene-Jean DUPUY and Daniel VIGNES.A Handbook on the New Laze of the Sea .Vol. 1 .Dordrecht Boston Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 1991. pp. 315-'381: Laurent LUCCHIN1 and Michel V( )ELCKEL. Droit de la Ater, La Ater et son Droit. Joint development agreements of offshore Les espaces maritimes (t. 1 ). ed.. Paris: Pedone. 1990. pp. 164'— 169; Jean C()MBACAU. Le Droit de la Ater . cd.. Paris: Presses Universitaircs de FJoint development agreements of offshore
rance. 1985. pp. 5867 ; Charles R()SSEAU . Droit Interna-tional Public. Les Relations Internationales (t. 4) .cd.. Paris:Sirey. 1980.pp. 358"-359.© Ar(2011 Number 1)60China Oceans Law ReviewJoint Development Agreements of Offshore Hydrocarbon Deposits:An Alternative to Maritime Delimitation in the A Joint development agreements of offshore Roth within and without the Exclusive Economic Zone or in Zones of Overla p ping Claims .by Professor Dr. Rainer Lagoni (Cairo Conference 1992). pp. 1"" 32: Rene-Jean DUPUY and Daniel VIGNES, A Handbook on the New Laze of the Sea .Vol. 1 .Dordrecht Boston Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 199 Joint development agreements of offshore 1 .pp. 275'-'307.® The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.made in Montego Bay.on December 10th. 1982.published at 1833 UNTS 3.rr.'ÌC ..ÍJoint development agreements of offshore
I TNif’i (K’Ii'1 I?... rinoti ........ 010^.017Joint Development Agreements of Offshore HydrocarlxAn Alternative to Maritime Delimitation in the Asia-(2011 Number 1)60China Oceans Law ReviewJoint Development Agreements of Offshore Hydrocarbon Deposits:An Alternative to Maritime Delimitation in the A Joint development agreements of offshore on of the continental shelf and the EEZ.(2011 Number 1)60China Oceans Law ReviewJoint Development Agreements of Offshore Hydrocarbon Deposits:An Alternative to Maritime Delimitation in the AGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook