Evidentiality, Logophoricity and the Syntactic Representation of Pragmatic Features
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: Evidentiality, Logophoricity and the Syntactic Representation of Pragmatic Features
Evidentiality, Logophoricity and the Syntactic Representation of Pragmatic Features
Evidentialỉty, Logophoricỉty and the Syntactic Representation of PragmaticFeaturesMargaret SpeasProfessor. University of Massachusetts, Amherstphone: Evidentiality, Logophoricity and the Syntactic Representation of Pragmatic Features (413)545-6835fax: (413)545-2792email: pspeas(3)l inguist.umass.eduhttps://khothuvien.cori!AbstractSome languages have evidential morphemes, which mark the Speaker's source for the information being reported in the utterance. Some languages have logophoric pronouns, which refer to an individual whos Evidentiality, Logophoricity and the Syntactic Representation of Pragmatic Featurese point of view is being represented.Notions like “source of evidence” and “point of view" have generally been treated as pragmatic, with few interestEvidentiality, Logophoricity and the Syntactic Representation of Pragmatic Features
ing repercussions in syntax. In this paper, 1 examine constraints on the grammaticization of these notions. I argue that a uniform account of these coEvidentialỉty, Logophoricỉty and the Syntactic Representation of PragmaticFeaturesMargaret SpeasProfessor. University of Massachusetts, Amherstphone: Evidentiality, Logophoricity and the Syntactic Representation of Pragmatic Featuresclaim of Cinque (1999) that there are projections for Speech Act Mood, Evaluative Mood, Evidential Mood and Epistemological Mode.keywords: evidential, logophor, moodEvidential í ty, Logophoricíty and the Syntactic Representation oí Pragmatic Features'0. IntroductionThis paper explores the mapping be Evidentiality, Logophoricity and the Syntactic Representation of Pragmatic Featurestween syntax and pragmatic features in the domains of evidentiality and logophoiicity. Although die constraints on both of these domains have generallEvidentiality, Logophoricity and the Syntactic Representation of Pragmatic Features
y been thought of as pragmatic and not directly represented in the syntax. (Chafe 1986: chafe and Nichols 1986: Sells 1987; Culy 1994), I argue (hat tEvidentialỉty, Logophoricỉty and the Syntactic Representation of PragmaticFeaturesMargaret SpeasProfessor. University of Massachusetts, Amherstphone: Evidentiality, Logophoricity and the Syntactic Representation of Pragmatic Featurescked (building on (Cinque 1999). The resulting model is one in which the syntactic representation is still built by means of a "'dumb' computational system", but syntactically-relevant pragmatic roles are configurationally represented.1. Constraints on evidential morphemes2A number of languages have Evidentiality, Logophoricity and the Syntactic Representation of Pragmatic Features a set of verbal al fixes or particles that express the means by which the speaker acquired the information s/he is conveying. In some languages, thesEvidentiality, Logophoricity and the Syntactic Representation of Pragmatic Features
e evidential morphemes are obligatory.-1(1) a. wiki-caxa-]f 'It's bad weather (directly exp.)'Makahb. wiki-eaxa-k'u'It was bad weather'-2c. wiki-caxa-Evidentialỉty, Logophoricỉty and the Syntactic Representation of PragmaticFeaturesMargaret SpeasProfessor. University of Massachusetts, Amherstphone: Evidentiality, Logophoricity and the Syntactic Representation of Pragmatic Features-nqa-paq-shfc. wanu-nqa-paq-c/ii'It sounds like bad weather1‘I’m told there's bad weather'Evidentialỉty, Logophoricỉty and the Syntactic Representation of PragmaticFeaturesMargaret SpeasProfessor. University of Massachusetts, Amherstphone:Gọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook