Product Liability in Maryland- Traditional and Emerging Theories
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: Product Liability in Maryland- Traditional and Emerging Theories
Product Liability in Maryland- Traditional and Emerging Theories
University of Baltimore Law ReviewVolume 16Issue I Fall 1986Article 21986Product Liability in Maryland: Traditional and Emerging Theories of Recovery Product Liability in Maryland- Traditional and Emerging Theories and DefenseEdward s. Diggesjr.Piper & MarburyJohn G. BillmyreLaw Offices ùỊ John G. BillmyreFollow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr Cf Part of the Torts CommonsRecommended CitationDigges, Edward S.Jr. and Billmyre, John G. (1986) 'Product Liability in Maryland: T Product Liability in Maryland- Traditional and Emerging Theoriesraditional and Emerging Theories of Recovery and Defense,' Untwnity ọf Bđltímm’ Law Rcruw- Vol. 16: Iss. 1, Article 2.Available at: http: .•■/MholarwoProduct Liability in Maryland- Traditional and Emerging Theories
tks.law.ubalta?du /ublr/vol 16/issl /2This Article is brought to TOU tor free and open access by SchobrWorks(,OUniveiWy of Baltimore School of Law. ItUniversity of Baltimore Law ReviewVolume 16Issue I Fall 1986Article 21986Product Liability in Maryland: Traditional and Emerging Theories of Recovery Product Liability in Maryland- Traditional and Emerging Theoriesow. Foe more infoematioei, please contact MwlaniSSibaltcdu.UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE LAW REVIEWCopyright © 1986 by The University of Baltimore Law Review. All rights reserved.PRODUCT LIABILITY IN MARYLAND: TRADITIONAL AND EMERGING THEORIES OF RECOVERYAND DEFENSEEdward s. Digges, Jr.t John G. Bilhnyref Product Liability in Maryland- Traditional and Emerging Theoriestỉn recent years, product liability law in Maryland and across the country has placed greater responsibility on the manufacturers of products causingProduct Liability in Maryland- Traditional and Emerging Theories
injury. In this article, the authors review the traditional theories of manufacturer liability and discuss the novel theories being advanced to expandUniversity of Baltimore Law ReviewVolume 16Issue I Fall 1986Article 21986Product Liability in Maryland: Traditional and Emerging Theories of Recovery Product Liability in Maryland- Traditional and Emerging Theorieshat because the pendulum has swung so far in the direction of placing greater responsibility on manufacturers, further expansion of manufacturer liability is both unlikely and inappropriate.TABLE OF CONTENTSI.Introduction........................................... 2II.Established Theories of Recover Product Liability in Maryland- Traditional and Emerging Theoriesy....................... 2A.Strict Liability................................... 31.“Sale of a Product” Requirement................. 52.Defect RequiremProduct Liability in Maryland- Traditional and Emerging Theories
ent............................. 11a.manufacturing defect........................ 11b.design defect............................... 12c.failure to warnUniversity of Baltimore Law ReviewVolume 16Issue I Fall 1986Article 21986Product Liability in Maryland: Traditional and Emerging Theories of Recovery Product Liability in Maryland- Traditional and Emerging Theoriesse” Requừement................... 21B.Negligence........................................ 22c.Warranty.......................................... 28III.Emerging Theories ofRecovery......................... 30A.“Saturday Night Special”.......................... 30 Product Liability in Maryland- Traditional and Emerging TheoriesUniversity of Baltimore Law ReviewVolume 16Issue I Fall 1986Article 21986Product Liability in Maryland: Traditional and Emerging Theories of RecoveryGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook