Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cybersp
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cybersp
Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cybersp
Fordham Law SchoolFLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and HistoryFaculty Scholarship1999Resolving Conflicting International Data PrivacyRule Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspes in CyberspaceJoel R. ReidenbergFordham Uimvnity School of Lứk',JREIDENBERG(fordharn.edu/faculty_scholarship& Part of the Internet Law CommonsRecommended CitationJoel R. Retdenher& Rciohrng Conflicting International Data Priva Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspcy Ruiti PI Cvlws/we, 52 Sun. L. Rev. 1315(1999-2000) Available at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/foculty_KholaKhlp/411 his Article is brought to you fResolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cybersp
or free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of SchoLirdup and History. It his been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by in aFordham Law SchoolFLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and HistoryFaculty Scholarship1999Resolving Conflicting International Data PrivacyRule Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cybersplving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in CyberspaceJoel R. Reidenberg*International flows of personal information on the Internet challenge the protection of data privacy and force divergent national policies and rules to confront each other. While core principles for the fair treatment Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cybersp of personal information are common to democracies, privacy rights vary considerably across national borders. This article explores the divergences inResolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cybersp
approach and substance of data privacy between Europe and the United States. Professor Reidenberg argues that the specific privacy rules adopted in aFordham Law SchoolFLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and HistoryFaculty Scholarship1999Resolving Conflicting International Data PrivacyRule Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspciety assigned to the state, the market and the individual: either liberal, market-based governance or socially-protective, rights-based governance. These structural divergences make international cooperation imperative for effective data protection in cyberspace. Professor Reidenberg postulates tha Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspt harmonization of the specific rules for the treatment ofpersonal information will be harmful for the political balance adopted in any country and ofResolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cybersp
fers, Instead, a conceptualframeworkfor coregulation of information privacy that can avoid confrontations over governance choices. The theory articulaFordham Law SchoolFLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and HistoryFaculty Scholarship1999Resolving Conflicting International Data PrivacyRule Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspdevelop mutually acceptable implementations of the universally accepted core principles. The article concludes with a taxonomy of strategies and partners to develop international cooperation and achieve a high level ofprotection for personal information in international data transfers.♦ Professor of Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cybersp Law and Director of the Graduate Program, Fordham University School of Law. A.B., Dartmouth; J.D., Columbia; D.E.A., Univ, de Paris I-Sorbonne. For pResolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cybersp
rovoking my early thoughts on this article at the 20ù International Conference of Data Protection Authorities, I thank Juan Manuel Fernandez Lopez, DiFordham Law SchoolFLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and HistoryFaculty Scholarship1999Resolving Conflicting International Data PrivacyRule Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cybersp Richard Camel!, Julie Cohen, Jill Fisch, Robert Gellman, Robert Kaczorowski, Mark Patterson, Russell Pearce, Charles Raab, Paul Schwartz, and Steve Thel. Work on this paper was supported in part by a Fordham Law School Faculty Summer Research Grant Award and benefited from my colleagues’ discussion Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cybersp at the Fordham Faculty Workshop. All opinions, errors, omissions, and misunderstandings remain my own. All Internet citations were current as of MayResolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cybersp
22,2000. Copyright © 2000 by Joel R. Reidenberg and the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.1316STANFORD LAW REVIEW[Vol. 52:131Fordham Law SchoolFLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and HistoryFaculty Scholarship1999Resolving Conflicting International Data PrivacyRule Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cybersplickstream Data..............................................1320B.■Multinational Sourcing.......................................1322c. Data Warehousing and Data Creep................................1323D. Pressures for Secondary Use and Profiling......................1324n. International Data Priva Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspcy Principles.....?........................1325A.Convergence on First Principles............................1325B.Divergence on Execution.............Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cybersp
.......................13301.Implementation.........................................13302.Interpretation.........................................1332mFordham Law SchoolFLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and HistoryFaculty Scholarship1999Resolving Conflicting International Data PrivacyRule Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspon and Detail Conflict.........................1338c. Compliance and Conflict.....................................1338IV.Governance Choices AND Information Privacy Laws...............1339 Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in CyberspFordham Law SchoolFLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and HistoryFaculty Scholarship1999Resolving Conflicting International Data PrivacyRuleGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook