KHO THƯ VIỆN 🔎

Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Accepted

➤  Gửi thông báo lỗi    ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạm

Loại tài liệu:     WORD
Số trang:         52 Trang
Tài liệu:           ✅  ĐÃ ĐƯỢC PHÊ DUYỆT
 













Nội dung chi tiết: Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Accepted

Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Accepted

1Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness-to-donate decisionsEnrico Rubaltelli* * . Dorina Hysenbelli1, Stephan Dicker!2-3, Marcus Mayor

Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Acceptedrga", Paul Slovic451University of PadovaDepartment of Developmental and Socialization Psychologyvia Venezia, 8 - 35131 Padova, Italy2University of Kla

genfurtDepartment of PsychologyUniversitătsstr. 65-67 - 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria3Queen Mary University of LondonSchool of Business and ManagementMile Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Accepted

End Campus - London El 4NS, United Kingdom4Decision Research1201 Oak St. Suite 200 - Eugene, OR, 97491, USA5University of OregonDepartment of Psycholo

Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Accepted

gy1227 University of Oregon - Eugene, OR 97403, USA* Corresponding author:Email: enrico.rubaltelli.ffunipd.itPhone: 0039 8276541Fax: 0039 8276511RUNNI

1Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness-to-donate decisionsEnrico Rubaltelli* * . Dorina Hysenbelli1, Stephan Dicker!2-3, Marcus Mayor

Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Acceptede National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. 1227729 and 1427414. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this mater

ial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.2Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in u Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Accepted

illingness-to-donate decisionsAbstractCharitable giving entails the act of foregoing personal resources in order to improve the conditions of other pe

Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Accepted

ople. In the present paper, we systematically examine two dimensions integral to donation decisions that have thus far received relatively little atte

1Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness-to-donate decisionsEnrico Rubaltelli* * . Dorina Hysenbelli1, Stephan Dicker!2-3, Marcus Mayor

Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Acceptedries in judgment and decision making, we hypothesize that people weigh these dimensions subjectively and perceive them asymmetrically, consistent with

prospect theory. Costs for the donor are typically perceived as losses, whereas benefits for recipients are perceived as gains. In four studies, we p Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Accepted

resented several scenarios to participants in which both donation amounts (costs) and number of lives helped (benefits) were manipulated while keeping

Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Accepted

the ratio of costs and benefits constant. Results from Studies 1 and 2 showed that willingness to help decreased as donation amounts and number of li

1Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness-to-donate decisionsEnrico Rubaltelli* * . Dorina Hysenbelli1, Stephan Dicker!2-3, Marcus Mayor

Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Acceptedr of lives at risk increase.(WORD COUNT: 180)Keywords: Prosocial behavior; donation decisions; cost; benefit; prospect theory3Allhough people may help

others for many different reasons (e.g., Bekkers & Wiepking, 2011). they usually forego personal resources (i.e., time or money) to improve someone c Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Accepted

lse’s wellbeing. Il seems reasonable to assume lhal the benefactor will engage in a subjective appraisal of the degree of benefit that can be achieved

Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Accepted

with a specific amount of resources. 1 he psychological underpinnings of such an appraisal likely involve both emotional aspects (e.g., sympathy for

1Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness-to-donate decisionsEnrico Rubaltelli* * . Dorina Hysenbelli1, Stephan Dicker!2-3, Marcus Mayor

Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Acceptedl in establishing whether the act of helping is worth it or not. This may especially be the case when personal resources are limited, and the donor ne

eds a compelling reason to give them away. In other words, the decision whether to help or not is likely influenced by the perceived tradeoff between Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Accepted

the resources a donor must give up and her perception of the beneficial effect of the helping intervention. The goal of the present paper is to invest

Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Accepted

igate whether the subjective weights attached to the personal cost and benefit of the helping action can lead donors to evaluate lives at risk in a no

1Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness-to-donate decisionsEnrico Rubaltelli* * . Dorina Hysenbelli1, Stephan Dicker!2-3, Marcus Mayor

Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Acceptedic, 2007). In line with prospect theory (Kahncman & Iversky. 1979), we present evidence that donors put more emphasis on the cost of giving up an incr

easing amount ol money compared to the benefit of helping increasing numbers of lives, leading to a decrease in their willingness to help.Perceived co Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Accepted

st for the donor and perceived benefit for the recipientsWe investigate whether a person’s decision to donate to a particular fund-raising campaign de

Rubaltelli Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness‐to‐donate decisions 2019 Accepted

pends on their subjective judgments about the cost they incur, and the benefit provided to the recipients, rhe tradeoff between these two constructs h

1Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness-to-donate decisionsEnrico Rubaltelli* * . Dorina Hysenbelli1, Stephan Dicker!2-3, Marcus Mayor

1Asymmetric cost and benefit perceptions in willingness-to-donate decisionsEnrico Rubaltelli* * . Dorina Hysenbelli1, Stephan Dicker!2-3, Marcus Mayor

Gọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook