Sude-DeAngelis-Wolf-Supplying-Choice
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: Sude-DeAngelis-Wolf-Supplying-Choice
Sude-DeAngelis-Wolf-Supplying-Choice
Technical ReportSUPPLYING CHOICE: AN ANALYSIS OFSCHOOL PARTICIPATION IN VOUCHERPROGRAMS IN DC, INDIANA. AND LOUISIANAEDUCATIONRESEARCH ALLIANCEFOR NEW Sude-DeAngelis-Wolf-Supplying-ChoiceW ORLEANSSCHOOL CHOICE DEMONSTRATION PROJECTYujie Sude, Corey A. DeAngelis, & Patrick J. WolfJune 26,2017EducationResearchAUianceNOLA.orgUAedreform.org/school-choice-demonstration-projectSUPPLYING CHOICE: AN ANALYSIS OF SCHOOL PARTICIPATION DECISIONS IN VOUCHER PROGRAMS IN DC, INDIANA, AND LOUISIANA Sude-DeAngelis-Wolf-Supplying-ChoiceYujie Slide Department of Education Reform. University of Arkansas ysude>@ email .liark eduCorey A. DeAngelis Department of Education Reform.UniversitSude-DeAngelis-Wolf-Supplying-Choice
y of Arkansas cadeange@email.uark.eduPatrick J. Wolf. PhD. Department of Education Reform.University of Arkansas pwolf@uaik.eduLouisiana Scholarship PTechnical ReportSUPPLYING CHOICE: AN ANALYSIS OFSCHOOL PARTICIPATION IN VOUCHERPROGRAMS IN DC, INDIANA. AND LOUISIANAEDUCATIONRESEARCH ALLIANCEFOR NEW Sude-DeAngelis-Wolf-Supplying-Choice Orleans. Tulane University. New Orleans. LAAcknowledgmentsWe thank the Smith Richardson Foundation for financial support for this research. We gratefully acknowledge Grant Clayton. Douglas Hanis. Robert Maranto. and Lindsay Wei.xler for then extensive comments on previous drafts and the Louisiana D Sude-DeAngelis-Wolf-Supplying-Choiceepartment of Education for then cooperation and assistance with providing the necessary data to conduct the analyses. Tile content of the report is soSude-DeAngelis-Wolf-Supplying-Choice
lely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of the Smith Richardson Foundation. University of Arkansas. TulaneTechnical ReportSUPPLYING CHOICE: AN ANALYSIS OFSCHOOL PARTICIPATION IN VOUCHERPROGRAMS IN DC, INDIANA. AND LOUISIANAEDUCATIONRESEARCH ALLIANCEFOR NEW Sude-DeAngelis-Wolf-Supplying-Choiceana, and LouisianaAbstractSince school voucher timds are public, policymakers fiercely debate how those funds should be spent. A goal of many decision-makers is to ensure that every private school option is “high-quality” through program accountability regulations. Private schools, however, have a s Sude-DeAngelis-Wolf-Supplying-Choiceay in rhe mailer. They can decide whether or not lo participate in a private school choice program and likely factor the type and level of program regSude-DeAngelis-Wolf-Supplying-Choice
ulations into that decision.We examine the impacts of private school regulations on the supply-side of voucher programs in D.C.. Indiana, and LouisianTechnical ReportSUPPLYING CHOICE: AN ANALYSIS OFSCHOOL PARTICIPATION IN VOUCHERPROGRAMS IN DC, INDIANA. AND LOUISIANAEDUCATIONRESEARCH ALLIANCEFOR NEW Sude-DeAngelis-Wolf-Supplying-Choiceoose to participate in a choice program. Independent private schools that accept substantial regulation from the state are likely to lie financially distressed and more willing to change their educational model in exchange for access to voucher-funded students.We employ a linear probability model to Sude-DeAngelis-Wolf-Supplying-Choice examine how school quality, as measured by tuition-level and Great School Review scores, is associated with program participation for schools. Our reSude-DeAngelis-Wolf-Supplying-Choice
sults largely confirm our hypothesis that higher tuition levels and larger cohort enrollments, conditions normally associated with high quality schoolTechnical ReportSUPPLYING CHOICE: AN ANALYSIS OFSCHOOL PARTICIPATION IN VOUCHERPROGRAMS IN DC, INDIANA. AND LOUISIANAEDUCATIONRESEARCH ALLIANCEFOR NEW Sude-DeAngelis-Wolf-Supplying-Choiceiew score and rhe school participation decision, indicating lower quality schools have a liiglicr tendency of participating in voucher programs HI all three stales, however the coefficients are not significantly different from zero State fixed effects reveal that2private schools in D C. and Louisian Sude-DeAngelis-Wolf-Supplying-Choicea, the two states that have higher regulatory burdens, are less likely to participate in vouchei programs.Keywords: private school, school vouchers, pSude-DeAngelis-Wolf-Supplying-Choice
articipating school, decision-making model, school choice, program evaluation, tuition, school regulation3Supplying Choice: An Analysis of School PartTechnical ReportSUPPLYING CHOICE: AN ANALYSIS OFSCHOOL PARTICIPATION IN VOUCHERPROGRAMS IN DC, INDIANA. AND LOUISIANAEDUCATIONRESEARCH ALLIANCEFOR NEWTechnical ReportSUPPLYING CHOICE: AN ANALYSIS OFSCHOOL PARTICIPATION IN VOUCHERPROGRAMS IN DC, INDIANA. AND LOUISIANAEDUCATIONRESEARCH ALLIANCEFOR NEWGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook