technical-review-lake-champlain-tmdl-modeling
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: technical-review-lake-champlain-tmdl-modeling
technical-review-lake-champlain-tmdl-modeling
TECHNICAL REVIEW OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN TMDL MODELING TOOLS(with Tetra Tech responses submitted for the Record in BLUE text)42095Prepared for:U.S. Environm technical-review-lake-champlain-tmdl-modelingmental Protection Agency, Region I 5 Post Office Square. Suite 100, Boston, MAPrepared by:Peter Shanahan, Ph.D., P.E., Bruce Jacobs, Ph.D., P.E., and Ken Hickey, HydroAnalysis, Inc.Kenneth J. Wagner, Ph.D.. CLM, Water Resources Services, Inc.William H. Frost, P.E., D.WRE, KCI Technologies, Inc.Paul technical-review-lake-champlain-tmdl-modelingH. Kirshen. Ph.D., Civil and Environmental Engineering Department and Institute for the study of Earth. Oceans and Space, University of New Hampshirewtechnical-review-lake-champlain-tmdl-modeling
Watervision, LLC481 Great Road, Suite 3 Acton. Massachusetts 01720 (978) 263-1092ContentsTask 1.1BATHTUB Lake Model...................................TECHNICAL REVIEW OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN TMDL MODELING TOOLS(with Tetra Tech responses submitted for the Record in BLUE text)42095Prepared for:U.S. Environm technical-review-lake-champlain-tmdl-modeling.............sTask 1.4Climate Change Analyses..........................................13APPENDIX A - Detailed review of BATHTUB and Missisquoi Bay reports.........15Review of BATHTUB Model report..........................................15Review of Missisquoi Bay Model report....................... technical-review-lake-champlain-tmdl-modeling............20APPENDIX B - Detailed review of SWAT Model Configuration, Calibration and Validation report.............................................technical-review-lake-champlain-tmdl-modeling
.......................22APPENDIX c - Detailed review of NPS Scenario Tool.........................33APPENDIX D - Detailed review of climate change anTECHNICAL REVIEW OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN TMDL MODELING TOOLS(with Tetra Tech responses submitted for the Record in BLUE text)42095Prepared for:U.S. Environm technical-review-lake-champlain-tmdl-modeling..........................40TECHNICAL REVIEW OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN TMDL MODELING TOOLSBackground and limitations of this reviewWatervision has completed a technical review of the following four modeling and analysis tools applied to support development of the Lake Champlain TMDL:•BATHTUB Lake Model•SWAT technical-review-lake-champlain-tmdl-modeling Watershed Model•BMP Scenario Tool•Climate Change AnalysesThis technical review was completed by a panel of experts assembled specifically to addresstechnical-review-lake-champlain-tmdl-modeling
the four components of the review. Kenneth J. Wagner. Ph.D.. CLM. of Water Resource Services. Inc. completed the review of the BATHTUB lake model; PetTECHNICAL REVIEW OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN TMDL MODELING TOOLS(with Tetra Tech responses submitted for the Record in BLUE text)42095Prepared for:U.S. Environm technical-review-lake-champlain-tmdl-modelinggies, Inc. completed the review of the BMP Scenario Tool; and Prof. Paul H. Kirshen, Ph.D., of the University of New Hampshire completed the review of the climate change analysis. Peter Shanahan and Ken Hickey coordinated the overall effort and compiled and edited this final report.This review is no technical-review-lake-champlain-tmdl-modelingt intended to serve as a "peer review" as defined by EPA guidelines. Rather, EPA has requested a “technical review.” This limited our purview and tasktechnical-review-lake-champlain-tmdl-modeling
s somewhat. As a predicate for the review, we accepted the previously made choices of modeling tools and simply evaluated whether those tools had beenTECHNICAL REVIEW OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN TMDL MODELING TOOLS(with Tetra Tech responses submitted for the Record in BLUE text)42095Prepared for:U.S. Environm technical-review-lake-champlain-tmdl-modeling the SWAT model. Instead, we accepted the choice of the SWAT model and evaluated if the SWAT model was used in a manner consistent with the current state of knowledge and practice. We also did not review the details of the inputs into the models or of the steps taken to apply the models. Thus, we di technical-review-lake-champlain-tmdl-modelingd not have the actual model input and output files to evaluate as a part of this review. Our review implicitly assumes that the mechanics of creatingtechnical-review-lake-champlain-tmdl-modeling
inputs, transferring files, etc., was correct and we did not “check" those or similar aspects of the modeling effort. We considered the data sources uTECHNICAL REVIEW OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN TMDL MODELING TOOLS(with Tetra Tech responses submitted for the Record in BLUE text)42095Prepared for:U.S. EnvironmTECHNICAL REVIEW OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN TMDL MODELING TOOLS(with Tetra Tech responses submitted for the Record in BLUE text)42095Prepared for:U.S. EnvironmGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook