THE DOUBLE CONTENT OF ART
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: THE DOUBLE CONTENT OF ART
THE DOUBLE CONTENT OF ART
THE DOUBLE CONTENT OF ARTby-John Dilworth(c) Dr. John Dilwonh Department of Philosophy Western Michigan University Kalamazoo. Michigan 49008. ÚSAFinal THE DOUBLE CONTENT OF ARTl draft before Prometheus Books publication, 2005CONTENTSintroduction 7Preface 10PAR I ON E PERFORMIN G AR I S1The Representational Content View of Artworks1.1.A Minimalist Argument lor the RC View ol Plays1.2.Having and Eating One's Representational Cake1.3.Advantages of the Double Content Approach THE DOUBLE CONTENT OF ART2More on Plays2.1.Plays and Fictional Wot Ids2.2.Comparisons with Walton's View2.3.Premature Theorizing, and Explanation of Fictions2.4.A Defense of tTHE DOUBLE CONTENT OF ART
he Fictional ist Approach2.5.Fictions And the Real World2.6.An Apparent Counter-Example2.7.Spatio-Temporal Location and Existence2.8.More on the InsepTHE DOUBLE CONTENT OF ARTby-John Dilworth(c) Dr. John Dilwonh Department of Philosophy Western Michigan University Kalamazoo. Michigan 49008. ÚSAFinal THE DOUBLE CONTENT OF ARTd of Representation3.2.The Variety of Representations of Plays3.3.Types, Tokens and Interpretations3.4.How the Property Transfer Condition Ensures the Failure of TypeTheory3.5.Interpretation and Wbllheim’s Incompleteness Condition3.6./X Double Performance Counter-Example to Type Theory3.7.Plays Are THE DOUBLE CONTENT OF ARTParticulars Rather 1 han lypesPART TWO VĨSUAT. ARTS4Ail RC Theory of the Visual Arts4.1.Artifacts, Artworks and Counter-Examples4.2.Type- Token TheoryTHE DOUBLE CONTENT OF ART
Versus the RC ViewTHE DOUBLE CONTENT OF ARTby-John Dilworth(c) Dr. John Dilwonh Department of Philosophy Western Michigan University Kalamazoo. Michigan 49008. ÚSAFinalTHE DOUBLE CONTENT OF ARTby-John Dilworth(c) Dr. John Dilwonh Department of Philosophy Western Michigan University Kalamazoo. Michigan 49008. ÚSAFinalGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook