Global warming advocacy science a cross examination
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: Global warming advocacy science a cross examination
Global warming advocacy science a cross examination
University of Pennsylvania Law SchoolILEInstitute for Law and EconomicsA Joint Research Center of the Lav/ School, the Wharton School, and the Departm Global warming advocacy science a cross examination ment of Economics in the School of Arts and Sciences at the University of PennsylvaniaRESEARCH PAPER No. 10-08Global Warming Advocacy Science: a Cross ExaminationJason Scott JohnstonƯ.XỈỈ ERSITY OF Penns YL VANIA40299This paper can be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Networ Global warming advocacy science a cross examination k Electronic Paper Collection: http: ssrn.com abstract-1612851[E'.c-c'icr c copyaavEitebteat í' tp./ssrnicorn.'abjtractK 1612851GLOBAL WARMING ADVOCACGlobal warming advocacy science a cross examination
Y SCIENCE: A CROSS EXAMINATION© Jason Scott JohnstonRobert G. Fuller, Jr. Professor and Director.Program on Law, Environment and Economy University ofUniversity of Pennsylvania Law SchoolILEInstitute for Law and EconomicsA Joint Research Center of the Lav/ School, the Wharton School, and the Departm Global warming advocacy science a cross examination ....................3IL Key' Issues ill Climate Science: Uncovering the rhetorical strategy of the IPCC and the Climate Change Establishment..............................................10A.What do ue Really Know about Global Mean Surface Temperatures, and Can weReally be So Sure about the Purported Global warming advocacy science a cross examination Warming Trend?.....................ỈỈ1Questions about the Measurement of Land Surface Temperature Trends..122Long-Tenn Temperature Trends: Basic QuesGlobal warming advocacy science a cross examination
tions about Global WanningScientific methodology Raised by The “Hockey-Stick”Affair............153The Missing Signature: Ongoing Data Disputes and theUniversity of Pennsylvania Law SchoolILEInstitute for Law and EconomicsA Joint Research Center of the Lav/ School, the Wharton School, and the Departm Global warming advocacy science a cross examination te Model Projections 211Concealed Complexity: The Positive Feedbacks Presumed by Climate ModelsAccount Entirely for very High Projected Future Temperature Increases.212Obscuring Fundamental Disagreement Across Climate Models in bothExplanations of Past Climate and Predictions of Future Climate...... Global warming advocacy science a cross examination .26c. Distracting Attention from Empirical Studies Tending to Disconfirm Key Predictions of Climate Models and their Preferred Interpretation of PaìeoGlobal warming advocacy science a cross examination
cỉĩmatic Evidence...................................................................3Ỉ1The Ambiguous Paleoclimatic evidence on the Direction of CausalUniversity of Pennsylvania Law SchoolILEInstitute for Law and EconomicsA Joint Research Center of the Lav/ School, the Wharton School, and the Departm Global warming advocacy science a cross examination Vaporand Precipitation are not Responding to a Warming Atmosphere in the Way that Climate Models Predict..........................................343Climate Feedbacks: Are Clouds and Rain Really Irrelevant?...........394Direct Evidence on Feedback Effects.................................46 Global warming advocacy science a cross examination University of Pennsylvania Law SchoolILEInstitute for Law and EconomicsA Joint Research Center of the Lav/ School, the Wharton School, and the DepartmGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook