APA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Public
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: APA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Public
APA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Public
GPAENGINEERINGCommentary ReportVictorian Networks Urban Encroachment Business Case ReviewAPA GroupGPA Document No: 16562-REP-001APA Project No: Busine APA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Publicess Case Number 230RevDateByCheckedQADescriptionA18712/2016RMcDSHIIKDraft for APA Review021/12/2016RMcDSHJEIssuedÊ*®JLGPA Eojinewnp Pty Ltd ABN 71 576 133 774Printed 20-Dec-2016Head Office - SA 121 Greenhitl RoadUnley SA 5061T -61 882998300OLD9 Gardner Close eoquoesgợsaenq can au Milton OLD 4064 WWW APA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Public gaaerg can au T *61 7 3561 1303GPAENGINEERINGVictonan Networks Urban Encroachment Business Case ReviewCommentary ReportEXECUTIVE SUMMARYGPA EngineeriAPA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Public
ng has been engaged by APA Group (APA) to prepare this Commentary Report on its Business Case Number 230 document (BCN230). This Commentary Report is GPAENGINEERINGCommentary ReportVictorian Networks Urban Encroachment Business Case ReviewAPA GroupGPA Document No: 16562-REP-001APA Project No: Busine APA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Public5) requirements are correct: and.2.Whether the approach adopted by APA to demonstrate that the proposed remedial actions meet ALARP is consistent with pipeline industry practice which has been adopted since the most recent revision of AS2885.1 was published in 2012. and which is proposed to be incor APA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Publicporated into the next revision of AS2885.This Commentary Report does not address the process by which APA risk assessments have been conducted or theiAPA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Public
r conclusions.This Commentary Report is based on the BCN230 revision provided to GPA under cover of the APA email sent 16 December 2016.AS2885.1 REQUIGPAENGINEERINGCommentary ReportVictorian Networks Urban Encroachment Business Case ReviewAPA GroupGPA Document No: 16562-REP-001APA Project No: Busine APA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Publicare three relevant topics addressed by BCN230:1)AS2885.1-2012 Section 4.7 special Provisions for High Consequence Areas makes requirements where there is a change of land use around high pressure pipelines from rural to urban land use. This includes the requirement to demonstrate that risks associat APA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Publiced with pipeline rupture are ALARP In GPA'S opinion the explanation provided in BCN230 accurately reflects the content and intent of the AS2885 1-2012APA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Public
provisions for High Consequence Areas and is sufficient for the purposes of supporting the case as presented2)AS2885.1-2012 Appendix F Qualitative RiGPAENGINEERINGCommentary ReportVictorian Networks Urban Encroachment Business Case ReviewAPA GroupGPA Document No: 16562-REP-001APA Project No: Busine APA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Publicermined by nsk assessment, and in particular. 'Intermediate’ risks. In GPA'S opinion the explanation provided in BCN230 accurately reflects the content and intent of AS2885.1-2012 provisions for “Intermediate risks" and is sufficient for the purposes of supporting the case as presented. While the sc APA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Publicope of this Commentary Report does not include the process by which APA risk assessments have been conducted or their conclusions, it is noted that:•WAPA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Public
here the consequence assessment concludes that a pipeline failure results in a Catastrophic’ outcome (i.e. inter alia multiple fatalities), the risk mGPAENGINEERINGCommentary ReportVictorian Networks Urban Encroachment Business Case ReviewAPA GroupGPA Document No: 16562-REP-001APA Project No: Busine APA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Publicby BCN230. if an ignited pipeline rupture occurs, people within a few hundred metres of the gas release will be subject to heat radiation which is sufficient to cause fatal or life-threatening injuries. In urban areas it is reasonable to conclude that a "Catastrophic" outcome will occur.3)Based on t APA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Publiche tables which show the susceptibility of each pipeline to penetration and the predicted failure mode for the pipelines, and APA's assessment of theAPA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Public
credible threats, in GPA'S opinion it is reasonable to conclude that pipeline rupture is a credible failure mode for each pipeline.ALARP ASSESSMENTGPAGPAENGINEERINGCommentary ReportVictorian Networks Urban Encroachment Business Case ReviewAPA GroupGPA Document No: 16562-REP-001APA Project No: Busine APA VTS - D3 - Urban encroachment business case review - 20161221 - Publicistent with pipeline industryGPAENGINEERINGCommentary ReportVictorian Networks Urban Encroachment Business Case ReviewAPA GroupGPA Document No: 16562-REP-001APA Project No: BusineGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook