ielts rr volume11 report4
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: ielts rr volume11 report4
ielts rr volume11 report4
lELTS4. Construct validity in the IELTS Academic Reading Test: A comparison of reading requirements in IELTS test items and in university studyAuthors ielts rr volume11 report4sTim MooreSwinburne UniversityJanne MortonThe University of MelbourneSteve PriceSwinburne UniversityGrant awarded Round 13, 2007This study investigates the suitability of items on the IELTS Academic Reading Test in relation to the reading and general literacy requirements of university study, throug ielts rr volume11 report4h a variety of reading tasks in both domains, and interviews with academic staff from a range of disciplines.ABSTRACTThe study reported here was conceielts rr volume11 report4
rned with the issue of test development and validation as it relates to the IELTS Academic Reading Test. Investigation was made of the suitability of lELTS4. Construct validity in the IELTS Academic Reading Test: A comparison of reading requirements in IELTS test items and in university studyAuthors ielts rr volume11 report4y of reading tasks in the two domains, and through interviews with academic staff from a range of disciplines.Tasks in the two domains were analysed using a taxonomic framework, adapted from Weir and Urquhart (1998). with a focus on two dimensions of difference: level of engagement, referring to the ielts rr volume11 report4 level of text with which a reader needs to engage to respond to a task (local vs global): type of engagement referring to the way (or ways) a readerielts rr volume11 report4
needs to engage with texts on the task (literal vs interpretative).1The analysis found evidence of both similarities and differences between the readilELTS4. Construct validity in the IELTS Academic Reading Test: A comparison of reading requirements in IELTS test items and in university studyAuthors ielts rr volume11 report4ehension of relatively small textual units. In the academic corpus, a sizeable proportion of tasks had a similar localliteral orientation, but others involved distinctly different forms of engagement, including tasks that required a critical evaluation of material (i.e. more interpretative), or whic ielts rr volume11 report4h stipulated reference to multiple sources (i.e. more global). The study also found a good deal of variation in the reading requirements across the diielts rr volume11 report4
sciplines.The results of the study are used to suggest possible enhancements to the IELTS Academic Reading Test. A useful principle to strengthen the lELTS4. Construct validity in the IELTS Academic Reading Test: A comparison of reading requirements in IELTS test items and in university studyAuthors ielts rr volume11 report4 academic study.AUTHORS’ BIODATATIM MOORETim Moore works in the the area of academic literacy at Swinburne University. His PhD was on the subject of critical thinking in the disciplines. Along with research into the IELTS Reading Test, he and co-researcher. Janne Morton, have also conducted IELTS-fu ielts rr volume11 report4nded research into the Academic Writing Test.JANNE MORTONJaime Morton works in the School of Languages and Linguistics at the University of Melbourneielts rr volume11 report4
as a lecturer in ESL. She is currently completing her PhD in the area of socialization into disciplinary discourse. Her research interests include acalELTS4. Construct validity in the IELTS Academic Reading Test: A comparison of reading requirements in IELTS test items and in university studyAuthors ielts rr volume11 report4uage support to tertiary level students for many years with a particular interest in the development of disciplinary reading skills. He is currently researching how law students from non-English speaking backgrounds engage with common law discourses.2CONTENTS1Introduction............................ ielts rr volume11 report4...............................42Review of literature.................................................. 52.1rhe IhL I S Academic Reading l est........ielts rr volume11 report4
........................52.2Construct validity...............................................62.3Dimensions of reading................................lELTS4. Construct validity in the IELTS Academic Reading Test: A comparison of reading requirements in IELTS test items and in university studyAuthors ielts rr volume11 report4....93.1Towards an analytical framework...................................93.2Disciplines investigated.........................................133.3Data and procedure...............................................144Findings.......................................................... 154.1IELTS rea ielts rr volume11 report4dings tasks.............................................154.2Academic reading tasks..........................................374.3Findings from intervielts rr volume11 report4
iews - Comments on IELTS reading tasks......595Summary and discussion of Findings....................................63lELTS4. Construct validity in the IELTS Academic Reading Test: A comparison of reading requirements in IELTS test items and in university studyAuthorslELTS4. Construct validity in the IELTS Academic Reading Test: A comparison of reading requirements in IELTS test items and in university studyAuthorsGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook