Ebook Observer performance methods for diagnostic imaging: Part 2
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: Ebook Observer performance methods for diagnostic imaging: Part 2
Ebook Observer performance methods for diagnostic imaging: Part 2
PartThe free-response ROC(FROC) paradigmKHEbook Observer performance methods for diagnostic imaging: Part 2
extent of the disease, that is, how far it has spread within the lungs, is an example of essential information that is still lost.1 Anytime essentialPartThe free-response ROC(FROC) paradigmKHEbook Observer performance methods for diagnostic imaging: Part 2
ieves the patient may be diseased, there is a location (or more than one location) associated with the manifestation of the suspected disease. PhysiciPartThe free-response ROC(FROC) paradigmKHEbook Observer performance methods for diagnostic imaging: Part 2
rmation. Neglect of location information leads to loss of statistical power as compared Io paradigms that account for location information. One way ofPartThe free-response ROC(FROC) paradigmKHEbook Observer performance methods for diagnostic imaging: Part 2
is present, the interstilium becomes inflamed and stiff, preventing the alveoli from fully expanding. this limits both the delivery of oxygen to the bPartThe free-response ROC(FROC) paradigmKHEbook Observer performance methods for diagnostic imaging: Part 2
and unrealized—for how radiologists and algorithmic observers are designed, trained and evaluated. There are other scientific reasons for accounting PartThe free-response ROC(FROC) paradigmKHEbook Observer performance methods for diagnostic imaging: Part 2
ms are compared using a visual schematic as to the kinds of information collected. An essential characteristic of the FROC paradigm, namely search, isPartThe free-response ROC(FROC) paradigmKHEbook Observer performance methods for diagnostic imaging: Part 2
nd-point, is emphasized. Two sources of radiologist expertise in a search task are identified: search and lesion-classification expertise, and it is sPartThe free-response ROC(FROC) paradigmKHEbook Observer performance methods for diagnostic imaging: Part 2
ds involve detecting the presence of true lesions. So, ROC methodology is, in this sense, also lesion-specific. On the other hand, location is a charaPartThe free-response ROC(FROC) paradigmKHEbook Observer performance methods for diagnostic imaging: Part 2
be interpreted according to current paradigms—these are not actual interpretations, just schematics to illustrate essential differences between the pPartThe free-response ROC(FROC) paradigmKHEbook Observer performance methods for diagnostic imaging: Part 2
egion may not correspond to another radiologist s suspicious region.In Figure 12.1, evidently the radiologist found one of the lesions (the lightly shPartThe free-response ROC(FROC) paradigmKHEbook Observer performance methods for diagnostic imaging: Part 2
ere is at least one lesion somewhere in the image.* Assuming a 1 through 5 positive directed integer rating scale, if the left-most lightly shaded croPartThe free-response ROC(FROC) paradigmKHEbook Observer performance methods for diagnostic imaging: Part 2
ot close to any true lesion. The third suspicious region, indicated by the lightly shaded cross, was not marked, implying its confidence level did notGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook