Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
I American Psychologist, in pressChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth DevelopmentNational Institute of Child Heat Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Developmentth and Human Development Early Child Care Research NetworkRunning Head: Child Care Effect Sizes: N1CHD SECCYD Acknowledgements: We wish to express our appreciation to the study coordinators at each site who supervised the data collection, to the research assistants who collected the data, and especi Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Developmentally to the families and child care providers who welcomed US into their homes and workplaces with good grace, and cooperated willingly with our repeaChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
ted requests for information.This study is directed by a Steering Committee and supported by NICHD through a cooperative agreement (CIO), which calls I American Psychologist, in pressChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth DevelopmentNational Institute of Child Heat Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development the N1CHD. and endorsement by the federal government should not be assumed. Participating investigators, listed in alphabetical order, are: Jay Belsky, Birkbeck University of London; Cathryn L. Booth, University of Washington; Robert Bradley, University of Arkansas, Little Rock; Celia A. Brownell, Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth DevelopmentUniversity of Pittsburgh; Margaret Burchinal, University of Nonh Carolina, Chapel Hill; Susan B. Campbell, University of Pittsburgh; K. Alison Clarke-Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
Stewan, University of California, Irvine; Martha Cox, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Sarah L. Friedman, N1CHD. Bethesda, Maryland; Aletha I American Psychologist, in pressChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth DevelopmentNational Institute of Child Heat Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth DevelopmentUniversity; Marion O'Brien, University of Kansas: Margaret Tresch Owen, University of Texas, Dallas; Robert Pianta, University of Virginia; Susan Spieker, University of Washington; Deborah Lowe Vandell, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Marsha Weinraub, Temple UniversityCorrespondence concerning the Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development review of this article should be addressed to Peg Burchinal (burchinalij>unc.edu)r FPG Child Development Institute, CB #8185, UNC,Child Care Effect SChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
izes: NICHD SECCYD 2Chapel Hill, NC 27599-8185I burehiniii@tinc.ediiChild Care Effect Sizes: NICHD SECCYD 3AbstractThis report provides a summary of cI American Psychologist, in pressChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth DevelopmentNational Institute of Child Heat Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Developmenthi Id care, for type, quality, and quantity, children (n—1261) were recruited at birth and assessed at 15.24.36. and 54 months. Whether the child was in care did not predict child outcomes, but multiple features of child care experience were modestly to moderately predictive. Higher quality child ca Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Developmentre was significantly related to more advanced cognitive, language, arid preacademic outcomes al every age and better socio-emolional and peer outcomesChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
al some ages.More hours of child care predicted more behavior problems and conflict according to the child care provider. More lime in center care waI American Psychologist, in pressChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth DevelopmentNational Institute of Child Heat Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Developmentect sizes arc discussed from three different perspectives: (1) absolute effect sizes that reflect established guidelines, (2) relative effect sizes, comparing child care to parenting effect sizes: and (3) the possible individual and collective implications based on the large number of children exper Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Developmentiencing child care.https://khothuvien.cori!Child Care Effect Sizes: NICHD SECCYD 4Child Care Effect Sizes:The NICHD Study of Early Child Care and YoutChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
h DevelopmentDuring the past 25 years a dramatic change has taken place in the early experiences of the youngest children in the United States. The prI American Psychologist, in pressChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth DevelopmentNational Institute of Child Heat Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Developmentuch care in their first year or two of life (West, Denton, & Germino-Hausken, 2000). The dramatic increase in the number of infants and preschoolers receiving nonmatemal care has generated questions about the effects of early child care experiences on children’s development (Booth, 1992; Fox and Fei Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Developmentn, 1990). In response to the need for data to address these issues, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) initiated a lChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
arge-scale prospective longitudinal study of the effects of early child care arrangements on children's development. This report documents the early cI American Psychologist, in pressChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth DevelopmentNational Institute of Child Heat Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development there is sufficient evidence to have practical implications for parents, professionals, or policy makersThe N1CHD SECCYD is in a unique position to address these questions because the data consists of extensive family data as well as child care and child outcome data (NICHD Early Child Care Researc Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Developmenth Network, 2005). The study- recruited over 1300 mothers soon after delivery, enrolled them and their babies when the infants were one month of age anChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
d followed them prospectively, collecting frequent measurement of child outcomes, family characteristics and parenting, and child care quality, quantiI American Psychologist, in pressChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth DevelopmentNational Institute of Child Heat Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Developmente findings were meaningful.Family selection effects must be addressed in observational studies of child care experiences. Parents make child care decisions, and those decisions are related to family characteristics that have been linked to child outcomes. Specifically, children are more likely to ex Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Developmentperience center-based child care as well as higher-quality care if they are from more advantaged families, in which parents have more education and inChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
come, larger vocabularies, less authoritarian childrearing beliefs, and in which parents provide more stimulating home environments and more responsivI American Psychologist, in pressChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth DevelopmentNational Institute of Child Heat Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Developmentuvien.cori!Child Care Effect Sizes: NICHD SECCYD 5 impoverished families are more likely than the working poor or middle-class children to experience high-quality center-based care through publicly funded programs such as Head Start and pre-kindergarten programs (Lamb, 1998). Family ethnicity and fa Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Developmentmily structure also are related to enrollment in and amount of child care (Capizzano, Adams, & Sorenstein, 2000; Ehrle, Tout, & Adams, 2000; PungelloChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
& Kurtz-Costes, 1999). Psychological dimensions of the family environment, including maternal mental health (i.e., depression) and attitudes about worI American Psychologist, in pressChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth DevelopmentNational Institute of Child Heat Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth DevelopmentTherefore, we measured family and child care extensively in the NICHD SECCYD to adjust for family selection factors in the examination of child care effects.The most widely accepted method for addressing this concern among psychologists involves including family characteristics shown to relate to bo Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Developmentth child care experiences and child outcomes as control variables in analyses. Although the exclusion of family selection factors clearly overestimateChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
s the true association between child care experiences and child outcomes, the inclusion of selection factors will underestimate the association to theI American Psychologist, in pressChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth DevelopmentNational Institute of Child Heat Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Developmentnts learn to use more effective discipline methods from teachers in higher quality child care settings, then including parenting as a covariate could underestimate the degree to which child care quality is related to behavior problems. We attempt to balance this concern in this report by implementin Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Developmentg both liberal and conservative methods for estimating the associations between child care experiences and developmental outcomes.Studies of child carChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
e must also address questions regarding the practical implications of observed associations. Some psychologists (Chin-Quee & Scarr, 1994; Dealer-DeckaI American Psychologist, in pressChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth DevelopmentNational Institute of Child Heat Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Developmentto be of interest to policy makers. However, until recently there were few guidelines for evaluating the magnitude of observed associations. Only recently have investigators reported effect sizes as an index of the magnitude of the association between child care experiences and child outcomes (Wilki Child Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Developmentnson & APATask Force on Statistical Inference, 1999). Effect sizes describe the direction and magnitude of the association between a predictor and anChild Care Effect Sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
outcome variable. Effect sizes are estimated in standard units such that -1 indicates a strong negative association (e.g., a difference of one standarGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook