Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)
Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)
EWIPOWORLDINTELLECTUAL PROPERTYORGANIZATIONCDIP/10/18 ORIGINAL. ENGLISH DATE. MAY 13. 2013Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)Ten Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)nth SessionGeneva, November 12 to 16, 2012REPORT1The tenth session of the CDIP was held from November 12 to 16, 2012.2The following states were represented: Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Argentina, Australia, Austria. Bangladesh. Barbados. Belgium. Benin. Brazil. Bulgaria, Burkina Faso. Burundi. Camero Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)on. Canada. Chad. Chile. China. Colombia. Congo. Costa Rica. Côte d'Ivoire. Cuba. Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Djibouti, Ecuador, Egypt, El SalvadCommittee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)
or, Ethiopia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. France. Georgia. Germany. Ghana. Greece. Holy See, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iran (IslaEWIPOWORLDINTELLECTUAL PROPERTYORGANIZATIONCDIP/10/18 ORIGINAL. ENGLISH DATE. MAY 13. 2013Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)Ten Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP) Morocco. Nepal. Netherlands. Nigeria. Norway. Oman. Pakistan. Panama. Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania. Russian Federation. Saudi Arabia. Senegal. South Africa. Spain. Sudan. Switzerland, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, U Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)kraine, United Kingdom, United Republic of Tanzania. United States of America. Uruguay. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of). Viet Nam. Yemen. Zambia. ZCommittee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)
imbabwe (95).3The following intergovernmental organizations (IGOS) took part as observers: European Union (EU). Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO), IEWIPOWORLDINTELLECTUAL PROPERTYORGANIZATIONCDIP/10/18 ORIGINAL. ENGLISH DATE. MAY 13. 2013Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)Ten Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)ffice of the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf (GCC Patent Office), Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie (OIF), South Centre, World Trade Organization (WTO). African Union (AU). Organization of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS) and Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)(11).page 24Representatives of the following non-governmental organizations (NGOs) took part as observers: Association iQSensato (iQsentato). BraziliaCommittee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)
n Center for International Relations (CEBRI). Communia. International Association on the Public Domain (COMMUNIA). Computer and Communication IndustryEWIPOWORLDINTELLECTUAL PROPERTYORGANIZATIONCDIP/10/18 ORIGINAL. ENGLISH DATE. MAY 13. 2013Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)Ten Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)Committee for Consultation (FWCC), Ibero-Latin-American Federation of Performers (FILAIE), International Association for the Development of Intellectual Property (ADALPI), International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Properly (AIPPI), International Centre for Trade and Sustainable De Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)velopment (ICTSD), International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC), International FCommittee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)
ederation of Associations of Film Distributors (FIAD). International Federation of Film Producers Associations (FIAPF). International Federation of PhEWIPOWORLDINTELLECTUAL PROPERTYORGANIZATIONCDIP/10/18 ORIGINAL. ENGLISH DATE. MAY 13. 2013Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)Ten Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)istic Association (ALAI). International Trademark Association (INTA), International Video Federation (IVF), Knowledge Ecology International, Inc. (KEI), Latin American Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries (ALIFAR). Médecins Sans Frontieres (MSF). Medicines Patent Pool Foundation (MPP) and Third W Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)orld Network (TWN) (26).5Ambassador Mohamed Siad Doualeh. Permanent Representative of Djibouti, chaired the session.AGENDA ITEM 1: OPENING OF THE SESSCommittee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)
ION6The Chair welcomed delegations to the session and noted that their presence reflected the recognition by all Member states of the importance of thEWIPOWORLDINTELLECTUAL PROPERTYORGANIZATIONCDIP/10/18 ORIGINAL. ENGLISH DATE. MAY 13. 2013Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)Ten Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)nce of the Development Agenda (DA) and It continued to play a central role in the implementation of the DA and its 45 recommendations. The Chair thanked the Director General. Mr. Francis Gurry, and the Deputy Director General. Mr. Geoffrey Onyeama, for the continued efforts to integrate the DA and i Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)ts underlying principles into the work of the Organization. The tenth session of the Committee marked the fifth year of the DA and the growing maturitCommittee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)
y of the process. The Chair noted that it was increasingly obvious that significant progress had been achieved in implementation with the close InvolvEWIPOWORLDINTELLECTUAL PROPERTYORGANIZATIONCDIP/10/18 ORIGINAL. ENGLISH DATE. MAY 13. 2013Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)Ten Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)ect-based implementation of the DA. Six independent evaluation reports would be presented for the Committee's consideration. He noted that these brought the total number of evaluation repons to 12. The Chair stressed that there was a great deal of work ahead as indicated by the sheer number of docum Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)ents that were before the Committee. He looked forward to an efficient and positive session. He informed the delegations that they would be receivingCommittee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)
a proposed schedule of work for that week. He would hold prior consultations on certain issues, where required, in order to ensure good progress. RefeEWIPOWORLDINTELLECTUAL PROPERTYORGANIZATIONCDIP/10/18 ORIGINAL. ENGLISH DATE. MAY 13. 2013Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)Ten Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)clusions would reflect the discussions on each document. Together, these would form the summary by the Chair. It would make the process of producing the summary more efficient. He sought the cooperation and goodwill of delegations for the meeting to be conducted in an efficient and constructive mann Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)er. The Chair informed the Committee that three side events had also been organized during the session and a flyer with details of the events would beCommittee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)
made available, in concluding, the Chair emphasized the importance of consensus building and hoped that the shared vision of the benefits that an intEWIPOWORLDINTELLECTUAL PROPERTYORGANIZATIONCDIP/10/18 ORIGINAL. ENGLISH DATE. MAY 13. 2013Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)Ten Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)uty Director General, to address the Committee.page 37The Deputy Director General welcomed the delegations on behalf of the Director General, Mr. Francis Gurry. The Director General was unable to attend as he was travelling and had requested the Deputy Director General to convey his very warm greeti Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)ngs and best wishes to all delegations for a successful session. The Deputy Director General thanked Ambassador Mohamed Siad Doualeh for his excellentCommittee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)
leadership of the Committee. He recalled that the Committee's report was discussed at the recent session of the WIPO assemblies. The delegations had EWIPOWORLDINTELLECTUAL PROPERTYORGANIZATIONCDIP/10/18 ORIGINAL. ENGLISH DATE. MAY 13. 2013Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)Ten Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)e. There was a general consensus towards the continued implementation of the DA and its recommendations to support socio-economic development in WIPO Member Slates. The Deputy Director General noted that a significant number of documents had been prepared for the Committee's session. These included Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)the annual Progress Report on ongoing DA projects as well as the 19 recommendations which did not require additional resources for implementation. TheCommittee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)
reports should enable the Committee to assess how the projects and activities had furthered the objectives of the DA recommendations and prepared theEWIPOWORLDINTELLECTUAL PROPERTYORGANIZATIONCDIP/10/18 ORIGINAL. ENGLISH DATE. MAY 13. 2013Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)Ten Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)ix independent evaluation reports on completed DA projects. The value of monitoring and evaluation was reflected in the recommendations of the DA. The Deputy Director General stressed that the Secretariat attached great importance to the need to provide continued feedback to the Member Slates and fo Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)r the evaluation of progress in the field of development to be conducted in an objective and effective manner. The external review of WIPO's technicalCommittee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)
assistance was also very important area for the Secretariat and he looked toward to the Committee’s deliberations on the issues raised in that reviewEWIPOWORLDINTELLECTUAL PROPERTYORGANIZATIONCDIP/10/18 ORIGINAL. ENGLISH DATE. MAY 13. 2013Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)Ten Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)ination of that review. The Secretariat also looked toward to the Committee’s deliberations and recommendations on the Conference on IP and Development as well as Phase II of the Project on Developing Tools for Access to Patent Information. He stressed on the need for constructive engagement by all Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)Member states in order to reach consensus on issues where there was disagreement in the Committee. This was required to achieve progress on those issuCommittee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)
es and the shared objective of advancing the role of intellectual property in development. The tenth session of the Committee marked the fifth year siGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook