An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Myth
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Myth
An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Myth
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Lawy°lurn.e.l2 . . _____ Article 1Issue 1 Issue 1 ■ Fall 2009Anicie 12009An Indirect-Effects Model of An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Mythf Mediated Adjudication: The CSI Myth, the Tech Effect, and Metropolitan Jurors' Expectations for Scientific EvidenceHon. Donald E. SheltonYoung s. KimGregg BarakFollow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law Vanderbilt edu/jetlaw Ò" Part of the Evidence Commons, and the Science and Te An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Mythchnology Law CommonsRecommended CitationHon. Donald E. Shelton, Young s. Kim, and Gregg Barak, An Indirect-Effects Model of MediatedAdjudication: TheAn Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Myth
CSI Myth, the Tech Effect, and Metropolitan Jurors’ Expectations for Scientific Evidence.12 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 1 (Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Lawy°lurn.e.l2 . . _____ Article 1Issue 1 Issue 1 ■ Fall 2009Anicie 12009An Indirect-Effects Model of An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Mythnderbilt Lav/. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law For more information, please contact mark j williams3>vanderbilt edu.VANDERBILT JOURNAL OF ENTERTAINMENT AND TECHNOLOGY LAWVolume 12Fall 200 An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Myth9Number 1An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication: The CSỈ Myth, the Tech Effect, and Metropolitan Jurors’ Expectations for Scientific EvideAn Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Myth
nceHon. Donald E. Shelton , Young s. Kim**, and Gregg Barak***AbstractPart 1 of this article defines the *'CSI effect, ” a phrase has come to have manVanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Lawy°lurn.e.l2 . . _____ Article 1Issue 1 Issue 1 ■ Fall 2009Anicie 12009An Indirect-Effects Model of An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Myth a felony trial judge in Michigan for nineteen years and >8 an adjunct faculty member in the Criminology and Political Science Departments at Eastern Michigan University. J.D., University of Michigan Law School, 1969; M.A., Criminology. Eastern Michigan University, ‘2007; B.A., Social Science, Weste An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Mythrn Michigan University, 1966.Young s. Kim is an Assistant Professor of Criminology at Eastern Michigan University. Ph.D., Crime, Law and Justice, PennAn Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Myth
sylvania State University, 2001; M.A., Crime, Law and Justice. Pennsylvania Slate University, 1998; M.A., Social Psychology, Yonsei University, 1993; Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Lawy°lurn.e.l2 . . _____ Article 1Issue 1 Issue 1 ■ Fall 2009Anicie 12009An Indirect-Effects Model of An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Mythd Visiting Professor of the College of Justice & Safety at Eastern Kentucky University. Ph.D., Criminology, University of California, Berkeley, 1974; M. Crim., University of California. Berkeley, 1971; A.B., Criminology, University of California, Berkeley.The authors appreciate the cooperation of Wa An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Mythyne County Circuit Judge Edward Ewell, Jr. and are especially grateful to the staff of the Wayne County Circuit Court Jury Services Office, includingAn Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Myth
Mary Kay Wimsatt, Ilene Marschner, Kari Komiensky, Gina Jackson, and Audrey Mitchell. Judicial Attorney Kelly Roberts was vital in the administration Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Lawy°lurn.e.l2 . . _____ Article 1Issue 1 Issue 1 ■ Fall 2009Anicie 12009An Indirect-Effects Model of An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Myth 12:1:1effect” as observed in juror behavior documented in a new study conducted in Wayne County (Detroit), Michigan, and then looking at causative factors that may be related to an explanation of those observed effects. Part ỈI describes the methodology of the Wayne County study, provides a descrip An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Mythtive analysis of Wayne County jurors, and compares the jurors demographically to the Washtenaw County jurors who were surveyed in 2006. Part III analyAn Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Myth
zes the Wayne County study results with respect to jurors expectations and demands for scientific evidence. The Wayne County study findings reinforce Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Lawy°lurn.e.l2 . . _____ Article 1Issue 1 Issue 1 ■ Fall 2009Anicie 12009An Indirect-Effects Model of An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Myth reinforces conclusions from the earlier study that there is no such causative relationship between watching CSI and heightened juror expectations and demands. Part IV explores the nature of the “tech effect” as one causative factor for those heightened juror expectations and demands as an alternati An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Mythve to the "CSI effect.” The results of regression analyses of new data provide some support for the 2006 study’s suggestion of a “tech effect”—that thAn Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Myth
e broader changes in popular culture brought about by rapid scientific and technological advances and widespread dissemination of information about thVanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Lawy°lurn.e.l2 . . _____ Article 1Issue 1 Issue 1 ■ Fall 2009Anicie 12009An Indirect-Effects Model of An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Mythectives of “mass-mediated effects” on public altitudes, behaviors, and expectations as a prelude to a suggested “Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication.” The authors propose an indirect-effects model of juror influences that triangulates the potential interactive effects of a "CSI effect” m An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Mythyth with the likelihood of a “tech effect” in the context of the “mass mediated effects” of law and order or crime and justice news media.Table of ConAn Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Myth
tentsI.The CSỈ Effect an d the Tech Effect....................7IĨ.The Study Method.......................................11A.Participants in the WayneVanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Lawy°lurn.e.l2 . . _____ Article 1Issue 1 Issue 1 ■ Fall 2009Anicie 12009An Indirect-Effects Model of An Indirect-Effects Model of Mediated Adjudication- The CSI Mythpectations for Scientific Evidence are High.......17B.The Relationship of CSỈ-Watching to HighVanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Lawy°lurn.e.l2 . . _____ Article 1Issue 1 Issue 1 ■ Fall 2009Anicie 12009An Indirect-Effects Model ofGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook