Reflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Cou
➤ Gửi thông báo lỗi ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạmNội dung chi tiết: Reflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Cou
Reflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Cou
Tulsa Law ReviewVolume 24 I Issue 1Fall 1988Reflections on Deflection: Appellate Assignment to Oklahoma'sCourt of AppealsWilliam w. MeansFollow this a Reflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Couand additional works at: https/Zdigitalcommons.Iaw.utulsa.edu/tlr Ờ* Part of the Law CommonsRecommended CitationWilliam w. Means, Reflections on Deflection: Appellate Assignment to Oklahoma's Court of Appeals, 24 Tulsa L. JI (2013).Available at: https://digitalcommons.lawutulsa.edu/tlr/vol24/issl/!T Reflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Couhis Article is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authoriReflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Cou
zed editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact megan-donald®utulsa.edu.Means: Reflections on Deflection: Appellate AssignmTulsa Law ReviewVolume 24 I Issue 1Fall 1988Reflections on Deflection: Appellate Assignment to Oklahoma'sCourt of AppealsWilliam w. MeansFollow this a Reflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas CouI. IntroductionIntermediate appellate courts exist in a number of forms in both state and federal judicial systems throughout the United States. They exist as both legislative and judicial creation. Although the intermediate appellate courts perform a wide variety of judicial functions which vary fr Reflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Couom state to state, these courts generally obtain jurisdiction over appellate cases in one of two ways: either appeals are lodged directly with the intReflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Cou
ermediate court from a trial tribunal, or appeals are assigned to the intermediate court by a supreme court or court of last resort.Oklahoma’s intermeTulsa Law ReviewVolume 24 I Issue 1Fall 1988Reflections on Deflection: Appellate Assignment to Oklahoma'sCourt of AppealsWilliam w. MeansFollow this a Reflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Couled initially with the Oklahoma Supreme Court. That Court, acting through its Chief Justice, assigns or deflects appeals to the Oklahoma Court of Appeals.To fully understand this deflection system in Oklahoma, an appreciation must first be reached regarding certain fundamentals: first, the developme Reflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Count of the need for or origin of the intermediate court of appeals• Chief Judge, Oklahoma Court of Appeals. This Article was prepared as a thesis for tReflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Cou
he University of Virginia Law School, Graduate Program for Judges, Master of Laws in the Judicial Process.1Published by TU Law Digital Commons, 19881TTulsa Law ReviewVolume 24 I Issue 1Fall 1988Reflections on Deflection: Appellate Assignment to Oklahoma'sCourt of AppealsWilliam w. MeansFollow this a Reflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Couals; third, the historical operation of the Court of Appeals and its relationship with the Supreme Court; fourth, the present status of the deflection system as it is being implemented by the Supreme Court. This article reviews those fundamentals.Throughout statehood, the Supreme Court has explored Reflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Couvarious adjunct alternatives for a solution to the problems of an expanding case load. Since 1971, these alternatives have involved the Court of AppeaReflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Cou
ls. At first, the Court of Appeals operated only as an adjunct to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court assigned only a limited number of cases, carefuTulsa Law ReviewVolume 24 I Issue 1Fall 1988Reflections on Deflection: Appellate Assignment to Oklahoma'sCourt of AppealsWilliam w. MeansFollow this a Reflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Coue load. As the Supreme Court used temporary divisions of the Court of Appeals, implemented new rules of appellate practice, and refined its work load relationship with the Court of Appeals, the role of the Court of Appeals gained new importance. Greater volumes of cases were assigned to the Court of Reflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Cou Appeals. The Supreme Court shifted some administrative responsibilities to the Court of Appeals for its own operation and case processing. Today, theReflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Cou
Court of Appeals is closer in function to a true intermediate court of appeals, relieving the Supreme Court of an excessive case load.II. OriginThe oTulsa Law ReviewVolume 24 I Issue 1Fall 1988Reflections on Deflection: Appellate Assignment to Oklahoma'sCourt of AppealsWilliam w. MeansFollow this a Reflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Couession as it searched for greater appellate capacity. The rationale for this intermediate system evolved as various adjunct systems* were tried to reduce the backlog or inventory of cases pending before the Supreme Court, that is, cases considered at issue or ready for consideration. The realization Reflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Cou that these adjunct systems were only temporarily successful in reducing the backlog led to the creation of an intermediate court of appeals.1 21.TheReflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Cou
adjunct systems referred to are the Supreme Court Commissioner scheme, the use of referees, and the use of law clerks.2.The experience of several statTulsa Law ReviewVolume 24 I Issue 1Fall 1988Reflections on Deflection: Appellate Assignment to Oklahoma'sCourt of AppealsWilliam w. MeansFollow this a Reflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Cou for increasing accessibility to the appellate process. M. Osthus, STATE Intermediate Appellate Courts 4 (1980).See alio R. Leflar, Internal Operating Procedures of Appellate Courts 65, 68 (1976). As Professor Leflar observes:The need for an intermediate appellate court in any particular state arise Reflections on Deflection- Appellate Assignment to Oklahomas Cous directly from theTulsa Law ReviewVolume 24 I Issue 1Fall 1988Reflections on Deflection: Appellate Assignment to Oklahoma'sCourt of AppealsWilliam w. MeansFollow this aTulsa Law ReviewVolume 24 I Issue 1Fall 1988Reflections on Deflection: Appellate Assignment to Oklahoma'sCourt of AppealsWilliam w. MeansFollow this aGọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook