KHO THƯ VIỆN 🔎

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

➤  Gửi thông báo lỗi    ⚠️ Báo cáo tài liệu vi phạm

Loại tài liệu:     PDF
Số trang:         77 Trang
Tài liệu:           ✅  ĐÃ ĐƯỢC PHÊ DUYỆT
 













Nội dung chi tiết: The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

Volume 48 Issue 1Article 52003The Stages of Legal Reasoning: Formalism, Analogy, and RealismWilson HuhnFollow this and additional works at: https://di

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realismigitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlrCf Part of the Jurisprudence CommonsRecommended CitationWilson Huhn, The Stages of Legal Reasoning: Formalism, Anal

ogy, and Realism, 48 Vill. L. Rev. 305 (2003).Available at: https://digitalcommons.law villanova edu/vlr/vol48/issl/5This Article is brought to you fo The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

r free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Law Re

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

view by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository.Huhn The Stages of Legal Reasoning Formalism. Ana

Volume 48 Issue 1Article 52003The Stages of Legal Reasoning: Formalism, Analogy, and RealismWilson HuhnFollow this and additional works at: https://di

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism formalistic analysis.* 1 Judges and lawyers reasoned deductively from base principles.2 Legal historians have persuasively described how leading judg

es and scholars fomented a revolution in legal thought in the 20th Century.3 Starting about 1910, legal realism—or policy analysis—entered legal reaso The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

ning4 to the point that today it would be unusual to find a judicial opinion or brief that fails to explore the policy implications of an interpretati

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

on of the law. This historical shift from formalism to realism suggests that there are stages of legal reasoning.In this Article, I argue that formali

Volume 48 Issue 1Article 52003The Stages of Legal Reasoning: Formalism, Analogy, and RealismWilson HuhnFollow this and additional works at: https://di

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realismng correspond to stages of cognitive and moral development. Second, examination of judicial opinions in hard cases reveals that courts progress from f

ormalism, to analogy, to realism, in resolving difficult questions of law. Third, these three forms of reasoning are necessary components in the evolu The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

tion of rules and standards.♦ B.A. Yale University. 1972; J.D. Cornell Law School, 1977: McDowell Professor of Law and Research Fellow, Constitutional

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

Law Center, University of Akron School of Law. Research for this Article was funded by a summer fellowship awarded by the University of Akron School

Volume 48 Issue 1Article 52003The Stages of Legal Reasoning: Formalism, Analogy, and RealismWilson HuhnFollow this and additional works at: https://di

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism Elizabeth Reilly and Dr. jay Levine of the University of Akron School of Law, Professor Todd Brower of Western State University College ol' Law. and

Professor Howard Denemark of the Texas Wesleyan School of Law for their generous and useful suggestions.1.See Morton J. Horwitz, The Transformation of The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

American Law 1870-1960 16-17, 199 (1992) (describing emergence of formalism in English common law system); see also Grant Gilmore, The Ages of Americ

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

an Law 41-67 (1977) (describing evolution of American law in period between Civil War and World War I). Horwitz characterizes American legal reasoning

Volume 48 Issue 1Article 52003The Stages of Legal Reasoning: Formalism, Analogy, and RealismWilson HuhnFollow this and additional works at: https://di

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realismg general propositions of law. See Horwitz, supra, at 17 (illuminating nature of Nineteenth century legal thought). Gilmore refers to the same period

as “the age of faith," (i.e.. faith in legal principles) in contrast to “the age of anxiety" which followed it. Gilmore, supra, at 41 (examining perce The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

ption of American law during period from Civil War to World War I).2.See Horwitz, supra note 1, at 199 (describing Legal Realists' critique of orthodo

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

x legal reasoning).3.See. id. at 199-200 (differentiating legal realism from conceptualism).4.See id. at 18 (describing growing importance of policy i

Volume 48 Issue 1Article 52003The Stages of Legal Reasoning: Formalism, Analogy, and RealismWilson HuhnFollow this and additional works at: https://di

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realisma Law Review. Vói. 43. ki. ỉ [2003]. Art. ỉ306Vii.ianova Law Review [Vol. 48: p. 305In characterizing these modes of analysis as “stages,” I do not me

an to imply that analogy is superior to formalism or that realism is superior to them both.5 In fact, one might reasonably argue, as Justice Antonin S The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

calia would, that the hierarchy proceeds in the opposite direction, in that one is forced to resort to analogy only where formalism has failed, and th

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

at realism is the last resort of all.6It would be even more accurate to reject hierarchy altogether, and the concomitant conceit that one form of lega

Volume 48 Issue 1Article 52003The Stages of Legal Reasoning: Formalism, Analogy, and RealismWilson HuhnFollow this and additional works at: https://di

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realismsary for the law to progress. The ultimate purpose of legal analysis is to create a system of laws that is clear, consistent and just, a code of condu

ct that is universally understood and accepted. But this is a task that is beyond human ability. As H.L.A. Hart observed, a perfect system of laws can The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

not be created “because we are men, not gods."7 However, formalism, analogy and realism each play a critical role in the attempt to create a code of c

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

onduct that is logical, predictable and fair.Accordingly, Part I of this Article defines formalism, analog}' and realism by describing the psychologic

Volume 48 Issue 1Article 52003The Stages of Legal Reasoning: Formalism, Analogy, and RealismWilson HuhnFollow this and additional works at: https://di

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realisming as “soft stages" that appear or are invoked sequentially, that arc structurally distinct and that “prepare the way” for subsequent stages. They ar

c not the invariant and hierarchical “hard stages” of Piaget and Kohlberg. For a discussion of the stages of Piaget and Kohiberg, see infra notes 77-1 The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

22 and accompanying text.6.Justice Scalia criticizes realistic analysis as inappropriate judicial “fact-finding," bitt acknowledges that it cannot be

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

"entirely avoided:"I have not said that legal determinations that do not reflect a general rule can be entirely avoided. We will have totality of the

Volume 48 Issue 1Article 52003The Stages of Legal Reasoning: Formalism, Analogy, and RealismWilson HuhnFollow this and additional works at: https://di

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realismrge is that those modes of analysis be avoided where possible; that the Rule of Law, the law of rules be extended as far as the nature of the question

allows; and that, to foster a correct attitude toward the matter, we appellate judges bear in mind that when we have finally reached the point where The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

we can do no more than consult the totality of the circumstances, we are acting more as fact-finders than as expositors of the law.Antonin Scalia. The

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

Rule of Law as the Law of Rules, 56 u. Cm. L. Rev. 1175, 1186-87 (1989).7.H.LA. Hart. The Concert of Law 128 (1994) (describing need for flexibility

Volume 48 Issue 1Article 52003The Stages of Legal Reasoning: Formalism, Analogy, and RealismWilson HuhnFollow this and additional works at: https://di

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realismo two human shortcomings: “our relative ignorance of fact” and “our relative indeterminacy of aim.” Id. Larry Alexander concurs with Hart by saying “|

a]uthoritative rules that are promulgated by human beings of finite reasoning and informational capacities and that arc meant to improve the moral con The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

dition of human beings of finite reasoning and informational capacities will always fail to capture precisely the requirements of morality." Larry Ale

The Stages of Legal Reasoning- Formalism Analogy and Realism

xander, Can Law Survive the Asymmetry of Authority, in Rules and Reasoning: Essays in Honour of Fred Schauer 39, 41 (Linda Meyer cd., 1999) (asserting

Volume 48 Issue 1Article 52003The Stages of Legal Reasoning: Formalism, Analogy, and RealismWilson HuhnFollow this and additional works at: https://di

Volume 48 Issue 1Article 52003The Stages of Legal Reasoning: Formalism, Analogy, and RealismWilson HuhnFollow this and additional works at: https://di

Gọi ngay
Chat zalo
Facebook